User talk:CRJ200flyer
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
You may want to check out a couple of pages about vandalism fighting, such as Wikipedia:Vandalism, Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism, Wikipedia:Recent changes patrol and WP:TWINKLE. If you have any questions, please feel free to let me know on my talkpage. -- Lear's Fool 01:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Bethke edits
[edit]My edits are accurate, and I stand by them. Try reading the damn novel before you label my edits "vandalism". The quote is in it, and the plot summary is accurate -- far more so than what it replaced, which frankly made no sense and read as if it were written by someone who barely spoke English. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.222.134.237 (talk) 06:42, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
The fact of the matter is you started an edit war with several people, about a quote that was more than questionable. If you face disagreement you should use the discussion tab to talk it out, not insist on changing the article multiple times. --CRJ200flyer (talk) 04:57, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]When don't you use the rollback feature? WAYNEOLAJUWON 21:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Did I rollback something I shouldn't have? --CRJ200flyer (talk) 21:13, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- No, but you were using Twinkle. You should request rollback at WP:Requests for permissions/Rollback which faster than Twinkle. Once you have the rollback feature, you can use Huggle or Igloo. WAYNEOLAJUWON 21:16, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Oh ok, you said "when" so I was confused... yeah I been thinking about that just wanted to make sure I had enough experience before asking for it. Do you think they would approve I only have 210 edits. --CRJ200flyer (talk) 21:20, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- They will because you must have 50 vandalism reverts in order to have rollback and you have more than 50 vandalism which means it will work. Also, if you want, you may create your huggle page with enable:true. WAYNEOLAJUWON 21:23, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Alright, I requested it. Thanks again for the help! --CRJ200flyer (talk) 21:56, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- Your welcome! You also got rollback and reviewer rights and start using Huggle now! Good luck using it! WAYNEOLAJUWON 22:52, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Rollback
[edit]Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:
- Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
- Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
- Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
- Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
- Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
- You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
- You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page
- If you have any questions, please do let me know.
HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer permission
[edit]Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Good job
[edit]The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
You're doing a good job on Huggle on your first day. Keep up the good work! WAYNEOLAJUWON 00:46, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
- When you revert an edit that's vandalism, please press the Q button which reverts the edit and warns the user. WAYNEOLAJUWON 00:50, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
[edit]Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)