User talk:CRAuser

Welcome

Hello, CRAuser, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:13, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

CRAuser, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi CRAuser! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Liz (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi CRAuser. In case you haven't noticed, I've answered your questions at the Teahouse. Feel free to respond there if you want more info. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:12, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, CRAuser. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES ^(talk) 00:50, 25 April 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

April 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Snapchat has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Snapchat was changed by CRAuser (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860497 on 2017-04-29T20:26:45+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:26, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CRAuser! Welcome to Wikipedia! I just wanted to let you know that the post above originated from an automated bot that somehow thought that your edit to Snapchat was vandalism. Your edit wasn't. Your edit landed in the false-positives category, and I will report this bug back to its developers. I hope you don't get discouraged from that, as it's strictly automation and nothing personal :) Have a good day! (P.S. If you write a reply to me, please use {{Ping|LocalNet}} in the reply, so I get a notification. Thanks!) LocalNet (talk) 07:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alistair Armand Vigier for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alistair Armand Vigier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alistair Armand Vigier until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 00:57, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm ToBeFree. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Erectile dysfunction— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:00, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Kozmo.com. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. -- Dane ^talk 04:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Kozmo.com. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Dane ^talk 04:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One does not need to source the company website. One can easily verify that the website is live by looking at the website. CRAuser (talk) 04:15, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Please review our verifiability and original research policies. These are why this edit is being rejected. -- Dane ^talk 04:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with how you are interpreting that article. Users would be interested to know the website is live again. CRAuser (talk) 04:18, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is merely about how the information is being included, not how i'm interpreting it. If you can add the information with a citation, please do so and there won't be an issue. A third party reliable source would be a good place to cite. -- Dane ^talk 04:20, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]