User talk:CJDV

November 2022

Hello, I'm VickKiang. I noticed that you recently removed content from Casper de Vries without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. VickKiang (talk) 09:34, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Casper de Vries, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 09:38, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Casper de Vries. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Casper de Vries was changed by CJDV (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860583 on 2022-11-20T09:45:38+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:45, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 11:18, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]