User talk:CEAA ACEE
October 2012
[edit]
Hello, CEAA ACEE. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 15:01, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Username
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw how you edited or created Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, and I noticed that the username you have chosen, "CEAA ACEE", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or have the appearance of shared use. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. --Drm310 (talk) 15:44, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hi there, I was not aware that only individuals could post on their own behalf. We were merely updating out-of-date and inaccurate information on Wikipedia as it relates to the Agency and all of the information that is posted is from reliable sources (Agency website, Justice Canada website, etc.) The choice of user name is intended for transparency more than anything.If what we have done is incorrect, what do you recommend?
- You can request a username change - keep in mind an account and the username chosen should be used by only one person. Also, if you work for or represent the agency, I would declare that fact here and also read the plain and simple conflict of interest guide. The agency website would be considered a valid primary source but it's preferred that you use secondary sources if they are available (see Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources). Lastly, please sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tilde characters (~~~~) at the end of your message. It makes discussions easier to follow by showing who said what, and when. Thanks. --Drm310 (talk) 16:16, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act
[edit]I have restored some of the text you removed from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act article. Historical information is valuable for the article, so it should not be removed.
It also appears that you have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. Wikipedia content can be re-used for commercial purposes, and the Government of Canada has fairly firm rules about commercial re-use of content from its websites. If you are the copyright holder, you would have to follow the steps outlined in Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for this content to be used.
While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. (optional parameter) Thank you. --Drm310 (talk) 17:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC) __________________________________
Hi there,
In light of the numerous issues you have pointed out, can you please remove all the postings that we have made and revert back to the original versions? The three pages we have changed are: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, and Environmental Impact Assessments.
Thanks,
Lindsay
If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. If you prefer to be unblocked for the purpose of changing your username to a username which complies with our username policy, so that your contributions with this username are recorded as contributions of your new username and rather than creating a new account, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice instead. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 17:33, 2 November 2012 (UTC)