User talk:CDesmarest

Hello CDesmarest, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

CDesmarest, good luck, and have fun. – Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) ^talk 14:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CDesmarest, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi CDesmarest! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilfride Piollet (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wilfride Piollet.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 16:40, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Wilfride Piollet, Swan Lake, Paris Opera, 1977.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wilfride Piollet, Swan Lake, Paris Opera, 1977.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Super Mario Man 00:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfride Piollet

HI Camille. Thanks for stopping by my talkpage. Are you still interested in working on an article on Wilfride Piollet? I see that the French wikipedia has a article on her at fr:Wilfride Piollet and there are several book references on her. If you'd like my assistance, I'd be glad to help. I could create the article so you avoid the article creation/approval process, and then you could add to it at your convenience. I'm not sure if you're aware of Women's History Month in March, and that some editors are working on dance biographies. The article on Wilfride Piollet would be right in step (LOL) with that movement (LOL). --Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am still interested in publishing the Wilfride Piollet article. Yes !!! I would highly appreciate your help ! Thank you very much for offering to give a hand. I am not too sure of how to fix the " Comment: No independent, third-party references to confirm or establish the claims of notability" on the page "articles for creation". Here is the link, as I don't know wheither you can see it or not. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Wilfride_Piollet I didn't hear about the Women's History month, but it would be very appropriate indeed !! :) What shall I do for you to create the article ?

Hi Camille. I've created the article Wilfride Piollet. Now you can expand it! Just remember, though, that you must use Reliable sources for everything that you add or someone may remove it. If you'd like me to look at something you add, just leave a note on my talkpage again. Thanks for editing wikipedia and for reaching out to me. --Rosiestep (talk) 03:07, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article is certainly shaping up. The only change I made today was to move the bare External links to the article's talkpage. When someone is ready to incorporate their information into the Piollet article, they can do so and then reference their work accordingly. Would be glad to hear from you if you have other questions or comments. Keep up the good work! --Rosiestep (talk) 16:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 04:13, Tuesday, November 12, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Wilfride Piollet and categorizing

Hi Camille, this is a reply to the message you left on my talk page about categories. It's preferable to use the most specific and relevant categories available; try not to use general categories unless there simply isn't anything more specific. Also, try to use only the most relevant category from within a class of similar categories. For example, Wilfride Piollet is a choreographer, so cat:choreographers is a better choice than cat:choreography; also note that cat:choreography is a container category for cat:choreographers, so she should not appear in both categories in any case. Although she does employ dance technique, she is not known for a particular technique, so that's not an especially relevant category. As for cat:ballet, it is a very broad category and therefore should have few if any articles in it (except ballet), so most anything related to ballet should be in some subcategory of ballet. For more information about categories, please have a look at WP:CAT, and keep up the good work! Lambtron (talk) 23:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:CDesmarest/sandbox (May 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CDesmarest/sandbox.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:57, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. If you like, in the next couple of days, I'll help you move forward with the Jean Guizerix article as he meets notability requirements. --Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Camille. I've created the article Jean Guizerix. It's ready for you to expand, improve, etc. etc. Happy editing! --Rosiestep (talk) 02:20, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Jean Guizerix (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jean Guizerix.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

j⚛e decker ^talk 00:08, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wilfride Piollet concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wilfride Piollet, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wilfride Piollet

Hello CDesmarest. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Wilfride Piollet".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wilfride Piollet}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:19, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfride Piollet

@JMHamo: A friendly FYI that I assisted CDesmarest in creating the Wilfride Piollet article in March (during Women's History Month, the 2014 emphasis being on dancers). We should have notified AfC that the AfC entry was no longer needed; sorry for forgetting that step. Best, --Rosiestep (talk) 05:32, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jean Guizerix concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jean Guizerix, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:44, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jean Guizerix

Hello CDesmarest. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Jean Guizerix".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Jean Guizerix}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:59, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]