User talk:CAPTAINAMERICAMARVEL

November 2014

Hello, I'm VeryCrocker. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2014 Christmas special (Doctor Who), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. VeryCrocker (talk) 13:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Joe Hart, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:57, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Joe Hart. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. QED237 (talk) 21:28, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Andrew Garfield does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Chamith (talk) 13:05, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Jake Quickenden, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 19:54, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ben Haenow, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 20:01, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Voice UK

Hi, in the infobox you changed starring to judges which is incorrect as they are coaches, so we use starring (as coaches doesn't work). Please don't change this. Thanks. --MSalmon (talk) 16:26, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ben Haenow, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. For the final time, there is no source for Ben's date of birth. Put it in again, you will be reported for vandalism. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 16:16, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ben Haenow, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 14:04, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 18:29, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qed237. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Astro (rapper) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! QED237 (talk) 20:10, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Ben Haenow. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. UNSOURCED DATAE OF BIRTH AGAIN QED237 (talk) 20:13, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Charley Webb. QED237 (talk) 13:53, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Steven Gerrard, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:10, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ben Haenow, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 22:28, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a week for repeated addition of unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:TheVoiceofBritain.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:TheVoiceofBritain.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 21:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 23:32, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]