User talk:Bxrxbx

Welcome!

Hello, Bxrxbx, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Googleguy007 (talk) 14:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikipedia!

Bxrxbx (talk) 14:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Samheng Bora has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Samheng Bora. Thanks! Qcne (talk) 12:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have followed your comments. Thanks for your guidance. Bxrxbx (talk) 17:53, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samheng Bora has been accepted

Samheng Bora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 20:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Qcne I have added more information about his early life, career, and personal life with references and sources. Please help check. thanks. Bxrxbx (talk) 09:06, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ith Samheng has been accepted

Ith Samheng, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 16:22, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for approving. I will try to add more information. Bxrxbx (talk) 16:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pleng Chan has been accepted

Pleng Chan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 12:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for accepting my writing. Thank you so much. Bxrxbx (talk) 06:29, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @EmeraldRange Can you help me check why the page Pleng Chan you have approved was deleted? I tried to add some more information from reliable sources. Please kindly let me know how I can edit my writing style or something to make it more neutral since English is not my mother tongue. Thanks. Bxrxbx (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like someone else thought the content was too promotional. They thought the article. See the link below on G11 criteria. I can't read it or suggest changes, but you may contact the administrator who deleted to contest. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 22:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your guiding. I will contact them. Bxrxbx (talk) 07:56, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @EmeraldRange I have contacted the admin and I have learned from his guidance. Now I would like to write the article for review once again. Could you help check if it is from a neutral point of view? I hope I can do it better this time since English is my second language. Thanks for your kindness. Bxrxbx (talk) 14:45, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @EmeraldRange, Sorry to mention you but there is no one reviewing my draft. I was wondering if you could help check the draft again. Could you kindly let me know if the way of my writing is from a neutral point of view with my choice of words? I wish to learn about this and move on to more. Sending regards and love. Bxrxbx (talk) 15:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @EmeraldRange, Sorry to mention you again but there is no one reviewing my draft. I was wondering if you could help check the draft again. Could you kindly let me know if the way of my writing is from a neutral point of view with my choice of words? I wish to learn about this and move on to more. Sending regards and love. Bxrxbx (talk) 16:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer another editor review your article. I think the general issue may be that it is run-of-the-mill. While there are certainly sources and details, I'm not sure if the restaurant is unique enough. Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL) isn't an official wikipedia policy, but you might want to emphasize why this company is different and important as many coffee shops do things to help the community and sell coffee. Wikipedia can't have articles for every coffee shop that exists or even for every coffee shop ever visited by the United States Secretary of State or every coffee shop using traditional cups as there are thousands or millions of them. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 20:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @EmeraldRange for your comment. I will wait for other editors to have opinions on this. Really appreciate and respect your guidance. Thanks. Bxrxbx (talk) 09:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samheng Boros has been accepted

Samheng Boros, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pleng Chan (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

language is too promotional, review WP:NPOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pleng Chan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 20:59, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bxrxbx! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 20:59, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pleng Chan (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The last paragraph needs some work.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pleng Chan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 22:19, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]