User talk:Bx228

Welcome!

Hello, Bx228, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dr Debug (Talk) 14:01, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Manastir Mileseva.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Manastir Mileseva.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

well...

I said there,the man who made it,made it with purpose to make a image for public free use...So please abort scheduled deletion...Please,i am writing this 5 hours already,with pauses...please,don't be so cruel...

Well, now that you put the liscence back on, it should be fine. GeorgeMoney ^(talk) 23:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it's OK now. GeorgeMoney ^(talk) 23:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:25 totalni pogled na prijepolje.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:25 totalni pogled na prijepolje.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prijepolje

It says that it's written in poor English (which it is). I don't see how that's unclear. There's nothing wrong with it, it just needs to be cleaned. --Wafulz 18:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just read through it yourself:

During very long otoman period it have been raised a many objects. Most famous are Ibrahim Pasha's mosque and Sahat Kula.Ibrahim Pasha's mosque in Shararampov (one of tree regions in town,other two are Vakuf and Center of town), probably was built in XVI century.That is very beautiful and atractive mosque with one minaret, and it was covered by cheramida(special cover of the houses in that tme). Prijepolje's region is known as very rough past which was part of of First serbian revolt, Banine's revolt 1875, Javorian war 1876, Raonic revolt, balcan wars and both of world wars.

This almost reads like a machine translation. The grammar and syntax are very awkward and unclear, and a lot of the information is lost in the confusion/unintentional humour of the mistakes. --Wafulz 18:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. Er, why did you ask me? Only edit I made to that article was to suggest that the coat of arms be merged. --Phoenix Hacker 00:38, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prijepolje 2

Ма нема проблема, сређивање је још у току... Ако имаш још информација о Пријепољу, слободно их убаци, а ја ћу то сређивати што се енглеског тиче. --estavisti 21:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Да ли Пријепоље има 80 мјесних заједница? На списку их има стотинак... --estavisti 21:17, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Siguran ? Ja sam prepisivao iz statuta opstine Pijepolje gd es enavodi tachan broj to 82 odprilike ne moguche 100 ali proverichu,ja ima problem a sa cookiesima ksno mi se prikazuju promene pa ne mogu doro da se orjentishem...samo mi malo smeta sto si malo redukovo sadrzaj slika,ali dobro you're the boss...Bx228 00:37, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Da,refresh nisam uradio u editoru... :P Bx228 00:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC) Ok for now,i hvala josh jednom,i vidi nekako d apopunish clanak sa josh slika iz galerije,psoto mi je nekako ona zbrkana... Bx228 00:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:300px-Grb-Prijepolje.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:300px-Grb-Prijepolje.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Qualixxx 00:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC) hocu slike —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.150.78.77 (talk) 15:06, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Vimeo.155696.767b18.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vimeo.155696.767b18.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 01:34, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the orphaned fair use tag from this image and added "Should be used in coca-cola advertising section". The question now becomes, are you going to add it into the appropriate page? It is great you have identified a use, you should now use it. If it remains un-used, someone (perhaps even me) will likely come and re-tag it in the coming weeks.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 19:39, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of arms deletion

If you could provide an exact file name, that would help. --Fang Aili ^talk 14:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:25 totalni pogled na prijepolje.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:25 totalni pogled na prijepolje.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fang Aili ^talk 05:49, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Grb-Prijepolje.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Grb-Prijepolje.jpg. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:DSC00108.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:DSC00108.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 19:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pr923696.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Pr923696.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —BigDT 19:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Hisardzik.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hisardzik.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —BigDT 20:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pr923695.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Pr923695.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —BigDT 20:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:25 totalni pogled na prijepolje.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:25 totalni pogled na prijepolje.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fang Aili ^talk 16:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Tito 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tito 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fang Aili ^talk 17:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Manastir Mileseva.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Manastir Mileseva.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fang Aili ^talk 17:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More images needing sources

--Fang Aili ^talk 17:12, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Admir Veljovich?

Hello Bx228. Are you Admir Veljovich? If not, you must indicate an actual *source* for these images. Did you get them on a website? Over e-mail from Mr. Veljovich? Also, we need proof that he releases them to copyrighted free use. Thanks! --Fang Aili ^talk 15:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prijepolje

Pozdrav. Pa nedavno sam krenuo da sređujem sve članke o gradovima Srbije, pa sam stigao do Prijepolja. Mislio sam da će slike ovako bolje izgledati, ako ti imaš bolju ideju u vezi toga, slobodno to promeni. PANONIAN (talk) 10:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pa što se tiče slike, nije estetski da u članku slike stoje jedna pored druge. Slike se obično stavljaju kao ilustracija teksta, dakle ili levo ili desno od teksta, a ne ovako jedna pored druge. Zato mislim da je to loše mesto za sliku. PANONIAN (talk) 23:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pa koliko vidim, anonimni korisnik hoće da stavi link u članak, a ti taj link brišeš. U naslov "External links" se obično stave svi linkovi koji su vezani za grad ili opštinu. Zašto ti uklanjaš taj link iz članka? PANONIAN (talk) 23:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Pa zato shto taj link nema veze,sadrzinski,nikakve sa Prijepoljem,stim da bi posetioci chlanka bili jako zbunjeni,jer link nema nikakve veze sa chlankom,a josh manje Prijepoljem."

Kako bre nema veze sa Prijepoljem? Pa jesi li uopšte pogledao link: http://www.prijepolje.org/ Sa čime onda link ima veze ako ne sa Prijepoljem? Inače u infobox se stavlja zvanični sajt opštine a link koji si ti stavio nije zvanični sajt opštine. PANONIAN (talk) 13:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vidi: ja na takav način ne želim da razgovaram: gledam u nebo i vidim da je plavo, a ti me ubeđuješ da je zeleno. Pa ko je ovde blesav? Pogledaj sajt: http://www.prijepolje.org/ sad klikni levo na rubriku istorija grada: http://www.prijepolje.org/ist.htm sad klikni na geografija grada: http://www.prijepolje.org/geo.htm Pa kome ti pričaš da to nema veze sa Prijepoljem? Jel ti misliš da ja imam 5 godina i da možeš da mi prodaješ šarene laže? Dakle, očigledno imaš neke druge (lične) razloge zašto hoćeš da ukloniš taj link, a da onaj drugi (koji nije zvanični) predstaviš kao zvanični, i ako želiš da nastaviš konstruktivan razgovor sa mnom, onda bi bilo lepo da mi kažeš prave razloge svog ponašanja u vezi ovih linkova a ne da mi daješ odgovor u koji ni dete od 5 godina ne bi poverovalo. PANONIAN (talk) 15:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, vidi ovako: stvarno nemam vremena da se više bavim linkovima u tom članku. Praksa Vikipedije je da se u infobox stavljaju samo zvanični sajtovi opštine (a ne neki drugi) a da se u "External links" stave svi linkovi što imaju veze sa člankom (bez obzira da li je deo sadržaja u tim linkovima prekopiran odnekud). Prema tome, uredi taj članak kako želiš (ili kako ti već dozvoli anonimni korisnik koji se sa tobom ne slaže), ali te molim da od mene ne tražiš da ti pomognem u tom sporu ako ne želiš da prihvatiš moje sugestije. Toliko. PANONIAN (talk) 00:55, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nadrealisti.png

Hello, Bx228. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:Nadrealisti.png) was found at the following location: User:Bx228. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tformers-G1.JPG

Hello Bx228, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Tformers-G1.JPG) was found at the following location: User:Bx228. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 22:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Timofejev.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Timofejev.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 21:46, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Utisaknedelje.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Utisaknedelje.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:09, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Insajder.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Insajder.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:27, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Insajder.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Insajder.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:03, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Utisaknedelje.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Utisaknedelje.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Pr923695.jpg

File:Pr923695.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Lim river in Prijepolje.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Lim river in Prijepolje.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:DSC03314.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:DSC03314.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:52, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's mine image and it was clearly prompted and it was used for 6 years on Wikipedia as mine with clear copyright holder name as me , Admir Veljovic. And what happened to be deleted now ? This is outrageous , I contribute so much energy into this article and now you delete as you want. --Bx228 (talk) 12:04, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:The River Lim flowing through Prijepolje..jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The River Lim flowing through Prijepolje..jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:09, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for undeletion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that a response has been made at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion regarding a submission you made. A response is requested (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Sattelite pr.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sattelite pr.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Dom revolucije.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Dom revolucije.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Hisardzik.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hisardzik.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:12, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:25 totalni pogled na prijepolje.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:25 totalni pogled na prijepolje.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:52, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:30 trg turska vojna uprava.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:30 trg turska vojna uprava.jpg, which you've attributed to Admir Veljovich. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:54, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ecard prijepolje.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ecard prijepolje.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 22:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Manastir Mileseva.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Manastir Mileseva.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:10, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Fall pr.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fall pr.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:41, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Walking down the BID in Prijepolje.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Walking down the BID in Prijepolje.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:10, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Tito 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tito 2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:20, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bx228. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bx228. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bx228. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]