User talk:BwDraco/Archive 1

Archive 1

Proposed deletion of "HxD"

The deletion of an article you created, HxD, has been proposed for the following reason:

Non-notable freeware.

You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 02:44, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

New signature

I would like to hear from you about my new signature! If there is anything wrong, please let me know under this section. DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 22:46, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Brish school fo diffusion

Hello Dragon 280. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Brish school fo diffusion, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a hoax (see An introductory sociology by Kimball Young, wirtten 1934. Thank you. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 05:03, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Understood. User page and article corrected. DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 05:05, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Photographers' abbreviations

Many thanks for helping to bash my amateur efforts into a more presentable Wikipedia format. martinev (talk) 22:57, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. I'm still working on the article, so expect more improvements over the next few days. :) DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 00:05, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

The page is no longer under construction, but it still needs work; I expect that other editors will help copy edit the article. DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 08:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

I notice that Ken Papai (of photo.net) has added "L" as a Canon designation for a "luxury" lens, to the general glossary. I feel that it ought to be moved to the brand-specific list. Do you agree? All manufacturers have long lists of letter/number combinations to designate particular classes of lens. I am not at all sure that it would be appropriate to try to include any or all of these in this glossary. They are listed in the on-line glossaries that I have put in links to. How do you feel about this? Thanks again for your continuing improvements. martinev (talk) 18:35, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

I agree with moving this to the brand specific list. In addition, as the brand-specific list expands, it should be split up into separate lists for each brand, though not quite at this time. Keeping the article organized makes it easier to read and refer to. DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 23:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

I suggest moving the article to List of abbreviations in photography per WP:NCLIST. Is this a good idea? DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 23:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

I have been thinking along these lines too. Will you move it please? I am not experienced enough to have confidence to do it.martinev (talk) 18:35, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

 Done Page moved. DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 20:37, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. martinev (talk) 13:47, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Articles on individual Pentax lenses

I'm working on a series of new articles describing Pentax lenses, because there have been no articles covering any individual Pentax lens. The first article I have created is Pentax DA 18-55mm lens, and I intend to model these pages after Canon lens articles. If you can, please let me know about how I'm doing and help me find sources and other information to help build this and other Pentax lens articles; a list of lens articles to work on is on Pentax Lenses. Thank you. DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 03:27, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

I've created another article, this time on the Pentax DA* 55mm lens. DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 17:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

RE: Thank you

You are welcome, but I didn't delete them, it was Dabomb. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 21:48, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Gosh, I've never been subjected to personal attacks like these. Thanks a million to you and Dabomb. DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 21:52, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Sigh. All this happened during recent changes patrolling. This shows how tough it is to be a vandal fighter... DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 21:59, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

That's the cost of combating vandalism ;) Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 04:14, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

I don't know what led to that attack, but from my place it looks like you've been hit by a random maniac. This can always happen, but doesn't happen often, and even if it does, its easy to handle. Materialscientist (talk) 04:19, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

During recent changes patrolling, I found 85.210.103.45 (talk) to be blanking his/her own talk page, removing user warnings. I restored then, and the edit were undone with an offensive edit summary. This was when my user talk page began to come under vandalism. I never saw this first set of edits since the revisions were deleted while I was busy trying to report it to WP:AIV, which someone else had already done. When 85.210.103.45 was blocked, another IP address 85.210.99.232 (talk) came and repeatedly posted sexually suggestive material on my talk page. I suspected this to be an IP sockpuppet, and I had used Twinkle not fewer than seven times to rollback the edits before giving up and leaving it to an sysop to stop the offending editor and redact the affected revisions. April Fool's Day is a prime time for vandalism. DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 13:09, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

This was obviously not a friendly editor, but keep in mind that per WP:OWNTALK, IPs are allowed to remove warnings from their talk. Materialscientist (talk) 13:14, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Understood. It was an offensive edit summary that led me to revert it and issue a personal attack warning, which started the conflict. Thank you. DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 13:36, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Delete recent vandalism revisions from talk page history

{{Adminhelp}} Please delete thirteen revisions (12 instances of vandalism/personal attacks) by 85.210.99.232 (talk) from the edit history of my talk page. DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 22:37, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Hopefully done. Also semiprotected this talk for a day. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 22:45, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! :) DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 22:47, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Great job monitoring recent changes! Jsayre64 (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! :) DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 01:18, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

July 2012

I'm not disruptive editing it is the person with the IP Address 50.131.220.134 I keep doing edits to the article to get it how I want it and it keeps getting changed and I change it back and it gets changed again and also I'm not posting promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia I'm just going by the information I have on this person! Sk8terguy27 (talk) 05:13, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Post this at WP:COIN. DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 13:54, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tom Rice

I'm not posting unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person I'm just posting the info I have and was going to do more research and then clean up the article. The Speedy Deletion will be contested! Sk8terguy27 (talk) 05:13, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi Dragon280. I've declined your G11 tag, as the article is not unambigous advertising. Please use PROD or AfD if you wish to take it further. Thanks -CTS talk 05:42, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

ANI thread

Hi. I moved a comment that you posted to AN/I to WP:COIN (a better suited board). I notified the involved user. Just thought I'd let you know for future reference. Rjd0060 (talk) 06:02, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Jelina Haines

Hello DragonLord, My apology for posting about the info of Jelina Haines. Would you be able to assist me of how to do a bibliographic about her.

thank you, Jelina40 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jelina40 (talk • contribs) 07:07, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

I cannot confirm that there is not a conflict of interest. As it stands, based on your username, it certainly appears that you are, or are affiliated with, Jelina Haines. — DragonLord ^{(talk/contribs)} 07:12, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi DragonLord, Thank you i wasn't aware with the conflict of interest in the content. I was just merely adding a section on notable filipino- Australian. Would you be able to delete my user page as well.

Thanks, Jelina40 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jelina40 (talk • contribs) 07:37, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Craig Victory ‎

the edit was based on fact, people in this day and age should be warned about predators like him - freedom of speech that can be backed up with proof — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.166.48.89 (talk) 02:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Your edit was defamatory and was not backed by any sources. Wikipedia policy on biographies of living persons calls for immediate removal of defamatory material, and that's what I did. — DragonLord ^{(talk/contribs)} 02:32, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Please semi-protect this talk page

Due to constant vandalism (this is April Fools' Day), please semi-protect this talk page for 24 hours. Thanks. — DragonLord ^{(talk/contribs)} 15:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Protected for 12 hours -- Dianna (talk) 16:40, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 16:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Perins School

Hello DragonLord, thank you for your message to state that you undid my edit to Perins School. I believe you are referring to the "We strive for excellence in everything we do" This is not deliberate advertisement, it is simply the motto of the school. I, in no way, intended to advertise the school. I was about to add to this to explain in more detail that this is the school's motto.

Thank you very much for pointing this out to me, I am grateful and sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.225.116.198 (talk) 16:07, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

In cases like these, use the {{Under construction}} template, so that we can see that you're working on the article. Today is April Fools' Day, and we're on high alert for vandalism. Sorry for this mistake. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 16:09, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Breyer State

I am a rep for SACS accreditation body. The information is incorrect, as Breyer State is now in the process of acquiring accreditation. Also, The sources of the original text were provided by SEO's of competing schools. In addition to pursuing the accreditation process, BSU is pursuing a Civil lawsuit against the online groups who have contributed in providing the public with malicious and false slanderous information. Best, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.53.149.122 (talk) 16:46, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:No legal threats. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 17:02, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Is it worth alerting legal@wikimedia.org about this? Chances are what the IPs saying is a dud but we can't be too careful. MIVP - (Can I Help?) (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) 17:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Go ahead. This looks like a serious threat to me. I do not want to get too involved in this, and I'm worried about spam, so I can't send an email myself. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 17:09, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

Hi DragonLord. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Yunshui 雲‍水 08:38, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Parrish Art Museum

Hello, DragonLord,

I'm Mark Segal, PR and Marketing Director of the Parrish Art Museum. The changes I made, and you unmade, were made to more accurately reflect the museum, its mission, and its programs. There are inaccuracies in your version: the Esteban Vicente, Dorothea Rockburne, and Juliao Sarmento exhibitions took place in 2011. I tried to give more information on the Alice Aycock, Michelle Stuart, Pollock, Ossorio, Dubuffet, and Jennifer Bartlett exhibitions, including links to our website, but you have removed those references. Some of the past exhibitions you cited were quite some time ago, and I tried to update that section as well. Our director encouraged me to make the changes I made. I don't understand why you felt it was unnecessary to undo those changes and reinstate material that is dated and in some cases inaccurate.Msegal3054 (talk) 15:31, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

The edit was rolled back because it reflected a conflict of interest, as you replaced well-sourced content with material that referenced the Parrish Art Museum web site. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 15:36, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Selena Roberts

How is your sentence any more 'constructive?' An already tainted Auburn football team? What is tainted? There have been 'allegations' not charges. If I say I heard you were a criminal does that make you tainted? Fix that sentence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blakeau19 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced controversial material about living persons. See our policy for biographies of living persons for more details. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 15:44, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Please give feedback on recent reverts

I've just received rollback rights, and I've been using rollback in RC patrols and automated reverts using Huggle. I'm concerned that I may have gone too far with some of my edits or may have made some mistakes. Please take a look at my contributions and let me know if there are any problems, and I'll try to address them appropriately. Thanks. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 16:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Addressed in IRC chat. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 16:32, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Removed link on ceramic knife

Hi, I just made a small contribution by adding an external link and in less than 2 sec i got a message from you saying that the link was removed, no explanation just " contact DRAGONlord". I have big doubts that in 2 sec you had enough time to read that article and to delete the link without any explanation. So....what happen ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.146.85.190 (talk) 16:49, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I thought the link was promotional. Sorry for the mistake; it has been undone. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 16:54, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

No problem, i was just ....surprised to see that after i found something additional to be added as source on that article, immediately was removed without ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.146.85.190 (talk) 16:56, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Rexx

Is that what you people do for a living--police Wikipedia edits from one second to the next? How tragic. It's even more remarkable that you folks tend to complain about "vandalism" when someone adds a verified fact to a scientific article; I guess you're all multiple subject area gurus, as well as self-styled arbiters of all fields of human endeavor . . . ? It reminds me of how amusing I used to find barring logins and deleting directories and what-not when I was a 16-year-old operator in college (today it would be called a system programmer, but, back then, admin/operation was included). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.249.207.46 (talk) 17:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

The edit you made to Rexx is clearly nonconstructive. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 17:08, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

the part i removed

the part i removed from the page women in islam says that in islam women can't prove rape cases, and that isn't true, i've studied islamic fiqh and sharia. and what happens in these states, are far away from islamic teachings, they usually misinterpret islam on purpose to save the tribal feudal capitalist elite using tribal uneducated mullahs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.205.142.1 (talk) 18:14, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

The content you removed had citations for it, and without an explanation in the edit summary, I can only assume that the deletion was incorrect. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 19:25, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Cigarette smokers problem

What did you think about what I wrote? Did you THINK? I am not familiar with how Wikipedia works, and thought the few sentences I wrote would of course not become part of the article, but rather, be a note to contibutors, alerting somebody who HAS the knowledge and HAS the inclination, to make the article better. That was my intention, and if you are a THINKING person, you could have handled it by doing something to that point. Maybe you have, if so, Thanks! Hopefully, if you are in a mood to share with me what it is you do and the benefits those actions have, you could just as speedily effect I the change I had hoped to make, a clarification/article suggestion. I still don't understand why it is a problem, if the other smokers have to wait for the match man to finish his smoke. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.19.183.102 (talk • contribs) 22:28, 4 April 2013‎ (UTC)

If you want to raise a discussion about the article, use the talk page. Attempts to start a discussion do not belong in article space. Thanks. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 22:35, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, BwDraco. You have new messages at Tolly4bolly's talk page.
Message added 19:45, 5 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tolly4bolly 19:45, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

About the edit war in List of Winx Club Episodes

I've trying to explain the user who is deleting the content that a site not being owned by Nickelodeon doesn't mean it's not official. As far as I know information from future episodes can be taken from tv schedules, which is the case of the content in the article. I want to report this user after the last comment he posted in my talk page "the soucre on winx club is not offical so stop the edit war...so shut the f*** up!! -.- that not official so stop it now!" and because he's always erasing information although it's sourced, hope this can help solve the edit war ! Javier12345 (talk) 00:17, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy Stop

Sure, kill it. I'm sure it's long been superseded. --Uncle Ed (talk) 17:43, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

The template is now waiting for speedy deletion. I'll probably subst the template in the few places where it's used, and wait out the seven days needed. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 20:11, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Parrish Art Museum

Hello Dragon Lord,

I have reviewed your comments and those of Americasroof. I would prefer to correspond directly via e-mail (mine is segalmparrishart.org) but if you prefer this means, that's fine. Would it be acceptable for me to take "baby steps," such as replacing the exhibitions currently listed in the "upcoming exhibitions include" statement with actual upcoming exhibitions, rather than past ones. I'm only interested in accuracy, and I don't see how that represents a conflict of interest. If somebody were to write that the new Parrish is 1,000 in length and I corrected that to 615 feet, how is my correction indicative of a conflict of interest?

That said, while I don't think the opening paragraph I submitted is puffery, I can see that it does not satisfy Wikipedia's standards. I was paraphrasing our mission statement. Would it be acceptable to include the mission statement by prefacing it with: "The Museum's mission statement is as follows..." or something to that effect. Most organizations have mission statements. I can see that if presented without a preface, as I did, it runs the risk of seeming like opinion, not fact. But if identified as a mission statement, I think it helps clarify what the museum is about, or at least what the museum is trying to be about, which seems a legitimate element of the entry.

I plan to make some updates in the Exhibitions section. Here's another issue: some of the previous exhibitions listed took place many years ago, and more recent exhibitions are omitted. Is there any reason I can't add exhibitions from the past two or three years, especially as they reflect our current orientation? Again, I'm not interested in stating opinions or "selling" the Parrish in any way. I'm just trying to increase the accuracy of the entry. I will be more mindful of existing links. Also, I was planning to add links to the material you deleted, but I hadn't gotten around to it yet.

I really would like to work cooperatively. I had not read the guidelines thoroughly enough before, and I do understand the need to scrupulously avoid unverifiable statements of fact or statements of opinion. I look forward to hearing form you.

Msegal3054 (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

I suggest you look at Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with close associations. Editors closely associated with the subjects of the articles they are editing are not barred from such editing per se, but you need to be careful not to violate Wikipedia policies. We appreciate your effort in making Wikipedia a more accurate source of information, but make sure you know the rules before you edit. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 17:23, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Small edits to the article are fine, but problems may arise if you link to the Parrish website, as we try not to rely too heavily on primary sources. If you want to make sure that each edit is okay, you can use the talk page of the article to suggest edits. You can also use the {{Help me}} template on your talk page to request assistance from more experienced editors. Once again, thanks for your efforts to improve Wikipedia. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 17:36, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Dragon Lord,

For starters, I'm writing to propose a couple of factual changes to the Parrish Art Museum's page. Rather than enter them myself, I'm submitting them to you for vetting. In the Water Mill location section, the correct dimensions of the building are 615 feet long and 95 feet wide. The figures of 634 feet and 94 feet seem to come from the source noted in footnote # 16. I don't know who that is, but it's not correct. I can provide a very detailed Herzog & de Meuron construction document with these and other dimensions. Or, I (or you) can cite Herzog & de Meuron Construction Document No. 349, Parrish Art Museum Water Mill, New York, USA. Project 2009 - 2010, Realization 2010 - 2012. In the same paragraph, it says "It has 37,300 square feet of gallery space." This is contradicted by the penultimate paragraph of the text. I think whoever wrote that meant to say that the building is 34,400 square feet (not 37,300), a figure from the same Herzog & de Meuron document.

In the penultimate paragraph, the correct figures for gallery space are 4,600 square feet for temporary exhibitions, 7,600 for the permanent collection. These figures, too, may be found in the Herzog & de Meuron construction document. Also, past exhibitions have focused on Esteban Vicente, Juliao Sarmento, and Dorothea Rockburne. Upcoming exhibitions will feature Alice Aycock, Josephine Meckseper, Michelle Stuart, and Jennifer Bartlett.

I hope you will agree that these are statements of fact. I agree citations are important, but a citation itself is not a guarantee of accuracy, as can be seen with citation # 16. Even the New York Times can make mistakes, which is why they sometimes issue corrections. Msegal3054 (talk) 18:23, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Good, but make sure that we can verify the sources. Unfortunately, I don't always have the time to handle every suggested edit, so you might want to use {{Help me}} on your own talk page to ask for assistance from other editors. Thanks for your effort to improve Wikipedia. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 18:29, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Just wanted to let you know I made a couple of minor changes, with sources where necessary. Thanks for your guidance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msegal3054 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

User SimoIla

Hi DragonLord,

I see that you have some history with Simolla and wanted to let you know that the user created Simona di Michele. I was going to nominate it for deletion but seeing your history I thought I refer this case to you.

Sosthenes12 (talk) 17:42, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Sosthenes12

Seitz Brewing

I own the trademark names Seitz brewing and Seitz beer. There is no conflict of interest. It is a hobby of mine. I sell nothing. Seitz Brewing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seitz Brewing (talk • contribs) 18:30, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

JDR Guitars

I listed a manufacturer of guitars (JDR Guitars) and you dismissed it? What is the credentials for your decision? They are a manufacturer of guitars and I would like to know what the issue is would be? They have a reputable website certified by Norton and you decided with no explanation to why it was removed?

Please let me know the reason?

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharvey120 (talk • contribs) 05:38, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

The link was inserted in a place where external links were not expected. Check for a section called "External links" and insert it there. Otherwise, use the talk page of the article to discuss the change you want to make. Thank you. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 14:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank You

Thanks for the cookies and the helpful links. sincerely Panpog1 (talk) 00:01, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

You're very welcome. From the edits I'm seeing in your sandboxes, it seems you're trying out some of the features of Wikipedia, especially syntax highlighting. For guidance on how this works, see MOS:CODE and http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:SyntaxHighlight_GeSHi. Once again, welcome to Wikipedia. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 00:14, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		I meant to give you this for the cookies and warm welcome but i couldent figure out how. Panpog1 (talk) 21:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Once you're ready to edit articles, feel free to be bold. We look forward to your contributions. —DragonLord^{(talk/contribs)} 21:10, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Pilipinas Kong Mahal

I just did what Wikipedia required - I posted material with supporting evidence. You may look for the book I mentioned at the Library of the Mariano Marcos State University - College of Teacher Education in Laoag City if you think I only made up the lyrics.

I also have a screenshot of the book where I derived the material. You may see it at: http://sphotos-e.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/284795_4036481689410_1797852481_n.jpg

And besides, what I posted was the OFFICIAL English version - the ORIGINAL lyrics of the song before a Filipino version was made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.38.228 (talk) 14:50, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

To clarify, I reverted the edit because you had removed categories and a template from the page. I probably made a mistake on this one. My apologies. —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 14:55, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

sorry

I just read in a book from eyewitness travel that his estate was 8,000 acres Top 10 Washington, D.C by Ron and Susan Burke — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.198.62.175 (talk • contribs) 03:51, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Personal Sandbox

Thank you for the welcome. I do have a question. I created a personal sandbox, but I am not sure how to add that link to my user page, so I can access it easily. When I try, it tells me that page has not been created, but it has. Please advise. Thanks. --Faerygirl81 (talk) 20:08, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Your personal sandbox is located at User:Faerygirl81/sandbox. Remember that page names are case sensitive, so User:Faerygirl81/sandbox is not the same as User:Faerygirl81/Sandbox (with capital S). —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 20:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the help. That must have been the problem. I will be more aware in the future. Faerygirl81 (talk) 17:50, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Code_monkey&diff=573951859&oldid=573738472

Hi, DragonLord, I did not add the image to "amuse" the readers, I merely did it to inform them how serious the Share-Alike CC are. Lotje (talk) 05:18, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

I still don't think that edit was appropriate. An argument regarding CC BY-SA licensing is not relevant to code monkeys and is not a factual statement that belongs in mainspace. If licensing is an issue, or if you believe that users are not fully aware of the consequences of the CC BY-SA license, you should discuss it at the village pump instead. —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 07:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

The Tower (Tarot card)

You placed a POV tag on the article, but failed to explain your concern on the talk page. I am removing the tag. If you re-insert the tag with an explanation, I will leave it on, and we can discuss. Leaving a tag without an explanation is known as drive-by tagging and is discouraged. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Monisha unni got killed in a car accident in 1992 Dec 5. Even she has a wiki webpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monisha_Unni

She is not a living person — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.195.92.187 (talk) 06:54, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

NIKSUN Page

DragonLord, I am new to Wikipedia, but I believe the tone of the article I have posted is neutral and informational in tone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fasa99 (talk • contribs) 15:04, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Username

Hi,

Thank you for your message.

How can I change my username?

Best regards, Izabela — Preceding unsigned comment added by Systancia (talk • contribs) 16:01, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

To have your username changed, go to Wikipedia:Changing username. Alternatively, you may create a new account under a different username and abandon the old account. —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 16:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Scarlett Johansson

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Scarlett Johansson. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Drafts

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Drafts. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

edit

The source for the Hebrew alphabet is on Wikipedia. (SEE SOFIT) refers to the five Hebrew letters that are given a different form at the end of a word. See Hebrew alphabet/sofit 72.47.147.163 (talk) 15:44, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, your last edit didn't appear to be relevant to the article, and you did not give a citation for what you added. Wikipedia policy requires that added content be verifiable, not just correct. —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 15:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Camera lenses

If you're still interested in writing about lenses, I think we could make some progress along those lines. FWIW, I created stubs about the DA 55-300 and 560mm. Samsara (FA • FP) 10:09, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Great--thanks. Unfortunately, I'm going to be rather busy as I get started with graduate studies, but I'll see what I can do to contribute. —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 15:13, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Well, good luck, for now, with your studies. I don't have a problem with slowly creating more stubs; however, getting them to a more respectable state might require concerted effort. Maybe you can just quickly tell me what LensType refers to - I saw it in Pentax DA 18-55mm lens but could find no further info about it. Thanks. Samsara (FA • FP) 17:37, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

LensType is an internal data value which identifies the specific lens model. It is read by the camera and stored in the Exif metadata so that software can identify what lens was used to capture the image. ExifTool can be used to read and interpret this data. —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 21:33, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

And do you crowdsource those values? I suppose I shouldn't be surprised if your lens collection included a number of different variants of the 18-55... Samsara (FA • FP) 22:18, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Actually, I didn't add those values. This info was probably found on the Internet by another editor. You might want to look at the revision history. —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 02:30, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

My bad, should have checked. Thanks. Samsara (FA • FP) 04:36, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Hey, hope things are going well - how is your wiki motivation level? Anything photography-related you'd like to attack? Samsara 22:46, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Hey, nice to see you again. My interests have shifted towards Stack Exchange over the last several months and I'm no longer as active on Wikipedia these days. To be clear, I'm not retiring, but Wikipedia is on the backburner these days. Feel free to contribute, though, and thanks for stopping by. :) —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 02:37, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

HayatTV and Larin izbor

I can not remember that I did any changes in those articles. Nor I watch HayatTV nor like to watch Larin izbor TV novel.

Regards

--89.111.250.156 (talk) 13:09, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

IP addresses often change and may be assigned to different users or devices at different times. If you're on a network shared by several different users, it's also possible that another user on the network made the edits. It's likely the person who made the edit was assigned the same IP you currently have. If you expect to contribute to Wikipedia on a regular basis, consider creating an account as this will eliminate confusion caused by users sharing IP addresses. —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 02:41, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

26 Nosler

Hi DragonLord! New to this, definitely a challenge figuring out the Wiki language! I work for Nosler, and saw that you recently created and updated a page for our new cartridge, the 26 Nosler. Thank you for taking the time to do this! We'd like to collaborate on expanding the page to include more details about the cartridge. Is this something you'd be up for or do I just go ahead with making edits? Thanks for the help! Appreciate any suggestions or feedback! SharpShootress (talk) 17:06, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Go ahead, but make sure you follow the advice for editors which may have a conflict of interest. I don't actually shoot any guns, I just wanted to fill a gap in Wikipedia's coverage of firearm cartridges. Thanks. —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 17:15, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Australia (2008)

There should probably only be one of us restoring the vandalism on Australia (2008), I will defer to you from here on out. Enjoy, and thanks. Name Omitted (talk) 06:23, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Understood—will be watching the page. Sorry some content was lost in the revert. I've posted edit war warnings on the offending IP's talk pages. —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 06:26, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CSI seal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CSI seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:55, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

As a note to readers, the image was replaced with File:College of Staten Island seal.png. I've asked that it be deleted under CSD G7 as this image is no longer needed. —DragonLord^{talk/contribs} 19:17, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BwDraco. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Archive 1