User talk:Buntz23

Welcome!

Hello, Buntz23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 00:27, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Beja Kingdoms has been accepted

Beja Kingdoms, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 09:47, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Mendefera moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Mendefera. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it has too many problems of language or grammar and There was no indication of existence roo. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Otuọcha (talk) 05:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand. The page was perfectly fine. There were no language or grammar errors in my sentences. What do you mean by “existence roo”? I disagree with the removal of the article and want it to be reinstated. Buntz23 (talk) 05:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many, if not most, editors do not watch every page they interact with so you need to mention someone by including there name such as @Otuọcha (see Help:Notifications). I assume "roo" was a typo and they meant "too". Note that all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). Currently you have one source from the "Nharnet Team" from a domain that no longer exists Nharnet.com so difficult to judge if they are even a reliable source. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 09:17, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My source is from “Experiences of the Eritrean Liberation Army” which was written by Abdallah Idris, the head of the military office in the ELF. These are facts from primary sources that you are denying for some reason. The battle was a very much notable as it is a major battle in the Eritrean war of independence. The book called “Historical Dictionary of Eritrea” by Dan Connell and Tom Killion mentions the liberation of Mendefera by the ELF at the same time I wrote in the article. The ELF commander i listed operated in the highlands of Eritrea, where Mendefera is located. Just because you lack knowledge on this topic does not mean you can remove my article. I disagree with the decision of removing my article. @KylieTastic Buntz23 (talk) 09:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A source written by one side in a battle is not independent. Exaggeration and propaganda relating to wars is normal whoever the combatants are. It does not matter if I or anybody else has or does not have "knowledge on this topic" as Wikipedia is not a place people write things they know about but for articles written backed by multiple independent reliable sources. No reviewer would accept any article on any topic with one source, let alone written by an invested party. The policies of Wikipedia:Notability, Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:Reliable sources are key principles here. If the "battle was a very much notable" then other sources should exist to show notability then please do add and resubmit. We are not denying the battle was real or that is was not notable and important, just that the article at the moment does not demonstrate this. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 11:21, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your reasoning for the removal of the article is because you do not believe the primary source i provided? Please tell me what seemed exaggerated in my article? This is just pathetic, do you want to me to dig into the military archives of the Derg to find information about the liberation of Mendefera? If that’s the case then you should do it yourself because i have already provided a reliable source. Mendedera is one of the largest cities in Eritrea, its liberation is not a fabricated story. @KylieTastic Buntz23 (talk) 11:40, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Mendefera (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Mendefera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Buntz23! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beja Kingdoms

I was just looking at the English translation of al-Yaʕqūbī that you cite in the article Beja Kingdoms, & I can't find anything on the war with Alodia or the Dara as-Sawa military training school. I'm likely just looking at the wrong pages. Do you have page numbers? Pathawi (talk) 21:35, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Mendefera

Hello, Buntz23. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Mendefera, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Mendefera (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

Nothing has changed since the last submission. Previous decline still applies. If you continue to resubmit without improvement, the draft may be Rejected and you will be unable to resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Mendefera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 05:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Mendefera (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Footnote 2 and 3 does not support the claims.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Mendefera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:38, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you elaborate your statement? It was very vague. Buntz23 (talk) 04:37, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]