User talk:Bulletrajabc

Welcome!

Hello, Bulletrajabc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 18:25, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bulletrajabc, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bulletrajabc! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Nathan2055 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:26, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You recently accepted Praneet sah

In my view this was not ready for acceptance and it is now nominated for deletion with an acceptable outcome to migrate it back to Draft: namespace.

Since you arrived at Wikipedia on 5 August this year I do not believe you have the experience and expertise needed to review articles and I ask you respectfully to cease and desist until you gain expertise and experience. Fiddle Faddle 18:25, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bulletrajabc. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation.
Message added 18:34, 10 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Fiddle Faddle 18:34, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

I see you are claiming "Reviewer RIghts", something that you do not have. These are distinct from WP:AFC participation, something you are not qualified for either. Please remove the user box from your user page. Fiddle Faddle 18:47, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Praneet sah was accepted

Praneet sah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bulletrajabc (talk) 01:11, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ArcAngel (talk) ) 06:35, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

This is your only warning; if you move a page maliciously again, as you did at Praneet sah, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Fiddle Faddle 06:11, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The way forward

The final and only warning for page moves stands. What is important is that you understand why it has been given and that you act in a proper and co-operative manner from now on.

You have been given the warning for a move against consensus and policy, done for a second time, plus your other move, now undone. I asked you, very politely above, to stop, and you showed a cavalier disregard for this request. Please never mistake my politeness for lack of determination.

You are impersonating a valid WP:AFC reviewer and your behaviour is harming those people who have a genuine expectation of a fair review of their draft articles. In short your behaviour has brought WIkipedia into disrepute. This must and will stop. As you can see, any further transgression means that you have decided to opt for being blocked. This is cause and effect. You have been warned, so, if you transgress, a block is inevitable.

You need to know that it is not possible to evade blocks. It is not simply a matter of creating a new account and starting again. Blocks last, and block evasion, if attempted, is treated with seriousness. It is always discovered. Our administrators have tools not available to general editors which allow detection.

So, the choice is yours. Behave well, and in a collegiate manner, and enjoy your time here, or continue to behave badly and your time here will be short.

To show that you intend to behave well you are advised to make a contribution to the discussion at the Administrator's Noticeboard acknowledging that you have behaved incorrectly and giving firm assurances that you will behave well in the future. If English is not your first language and you need the assistance of a competent translator to understand these messages or to leave your own, please get that help. Fiddle Faddle 08:05, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (talk) 09:46, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]