User talk:Bugmenot123123123

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bugmenot123123123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for any unintended consequences that resulted from my humorous AfD nomination. I am using humor to cool my heads down after I had been involved in tense situations like the AfD discussion of the my now deleted first articles. Bugmenot123123123 (talk) 15:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There are no unintended consequences here. You very definitely intended to waste people's time. The block is appropriate. Yamla (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bugmenot123123123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have made up my mind, I am truly sorry for any and all real and perceived disruptions up to this point. I hereby promise that if I am given the second chance, I promise that I will try my best as much as possible to be never involved into disruptions and WP:DRAMA at the very very first place.Bugmenot123123123 (talk) 02:59, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In addition to the disruption, there is also CheckUser Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 03:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bugmenot123123123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17884 was submitted on Mar 25, 2017 17:40:59. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:40, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposing good faith or constructive edits on my talk page when the 6 month offer is ongoing

User:Vanjagenije User:Just Chilling Is it allowed to ping user(s) to my talk page and propose a good faith edit request while the 6 month period is ongoing? Bugmenot123123123 (talk) 03:25, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. See WP:EVADE: Wikipedians in turn are not permitted to post or edit material at the direction of a blocked editor. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vanjagenije But it says that "unless they can show that the changes are either verifiable or productive and they have independent reasons for making such edits." at the end. How about that? Bugmenot123123123 (talk)

Nevermind since I've went to IRC to get an advice on this matter, and it seems that it's possible especially the page undeletion part. Bugmenot123123123 (talk) 14:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]