User talk:Bucketsofg/Archive 5

Chris Kempling footnote error

Bucket, footnote 2 on the Chris Kempling article seems messed up (showing blank). I'd fix it, but I'm not as familiar as I think you are with the abbreviated references. Please see if you can correct it if you have time. Regards, Deet 01:50, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you're game I've got a new job for us

I started an article Peter and Murray Corren, and the Correns are now editing their own article, and have provided the key central document to the article (previously undisclosed I think). I've asked them to not edit the article directly as per Wikipedia's autobiography rules, but we need editors to go through their edits and incorporate the appropriate info into the main article. Deet 01:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I like your approach. I'm signing off for tonight because I don't want to cross edits with you and want to make sure that you have the freedom to have a fresh look at the whole thing. Deet 01:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Long-Overdue RfA Thanks from Alphachimp

Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent RfA, which was successful with a an overwhelmingly flattering and deeply humbling total of 138/2/2 (putting me #10 on the RfA WP:100). I guess infinite monkey theorem has been officially proven. Chimps really can get somewhere on Wikipedia.

With new buttons come great responsibility, and I'll try my best to live up to your expectations. If you need assistance with something, don't hesitate to swing by my talk page or email me (trust me, I do respond :)). The same goes for any complaints or comments in regard to my administrative actions. Remember, I'm here for you.

(Thanks go to Blnguyen for the incredible photo to the right.) alphaChimp ^laudare 01:39, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Laurentdion

FYI, this user resurrected a talk page in order to attack the participants in the deletion process for his vanity article Earth Man. You might be a target since you were involved. I posted a description of the problem at Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Laurentdion Richardjames444 13:24, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

song

Prolly I get boring, but I like your song! :D -- Already quite some time ago, some people on IRC came up with this song on the tune of "in the jungle, the mighty jungle". the tune is copyrighted i'm afraight, but it would be cool if you could try to sing it :) effeietsanders 21:46, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Rachel Marsden, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Warren Kinsella

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above. Arthur Ellis is banned indefinitely from Warren Kinsella and articles which relate to Canadian politics and its blogosphere. Any article which mentions Warren Kinsella is considered a related article for the purposes of this remedy. This includes all talk pages other than the talk page of Mark Bourrie. Arthur Ellis is required to use one registered account. For the Arbitration Committee. FloNight 03:47, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Marsden arbitration

A Request for arbitration has been filed regarding the editing of Rachel Marsden, alleging that it is not edited in accordance with Biographies of living people, and you have been named as one of the parties. Thatcher131 20:16, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:82.211.102.159

Er, I think you meant {{test5}}, not {{test-5}}. Regards, Mr Stephen 14:15, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

yes, of course. thanks. Bucketsofg✐ 14:18, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Halo's RfA

Bucketsofg...
Thank you very much for your support in my request for adminship. Ultimately, no consensus was reached, and I failed to be promoted, but I am very grateful for your support.
Bucketsofg, thank you for your support. It means a lot. I will hopefully improve as an editor, and I will keep your kind words close to me heart while I do it.
Yours, Th ε Halo ^Θ 22:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rachel Marsden

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rachel Marsden. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rachel Marsden/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rachel Marsden/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, FloNight 02:17, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A serious message - PLEASE READ

Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has a right if they wish to remain completely anonymous. Wikipedia policy on that issue is strictly enforced. Posting private information about a user, specifically their (alleged) name and/or personal details, is strictly prohibited as harassment, and users who do that are often immediately blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Such posting can cause offence or embarrassment to the victim of the posting, not least because it means that their name, and any personal criticism or allegations made against them can then appear on web searches. If you have posted such information, please remove it immediately. Please then follow the link to this page and inform people there that the information was posted (but crucially, do not repost it on that page). An admin or developer can then remove the information from the archives of Wikipedia.

If you do not ensure that personal information you posted is removed from this site you may be blocked from editing this site. REMEMBER: Wikipedia's privacy policy is there to protect the privacy of every user, including you.

Right, I would love to see you delete and finally remove all reference to my name and my personal information as I have requested since the earliest of points of deletion of my original post for the very reason that you all are requesting the same. I asked you kindly to remove all reference to me my name, my project name as it is one and the same in a way, or rather at least references me and all of my personal information, etc. and so on. As I mentioned earlier, this process seems quite hypocritical and one-sided. Please remove all reference to me and my projects as requested, and the user name of my original posts as that is personal info..

<redacted>

Would you please look at this article and SD if you think appropriate? The creator has already removed the {{db-bio}} once before. Thanks --Squid S K ^(1MC^•^log) 13:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response! (if you were the one that deleted it) --Squid S K ^(1MC^•^log) 13:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok trying to figure out why on Earth my name appears on some random wikipedia page, I guess cause I tried to make a page about myself, which I thought I could cause I saw thing like yours like the User:SqidSK thing, so I'm just being nice enough to ask you to remove it, because I don't like having my name down for doing something wrong thanks a bunch (please remove within the next week or I will) Sandbrgcatholic2728 18:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Get out more

Up 'til midnight Friday and five hours work on Saturday on the Marsden arbitration. Are you sure you're geting enough fresh air? Arthur Ellis 00:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

➨ **ЯEDVERS** awards this Barnstar to **Bucketsofg** for tireless hard work for Wikipedia. Much appreciated all round.

This user does not need fresh air. This user needs to keep working, hard, for the good of Wikipedia. The idea that fresh air is good for you is a myth. Please do not encourage this user to leave the keyboard. Total Devotion to Wikipedia is a Good Thing. Freedom is Slavery. Two Plus Two Must Be Cited. Thank you :o) :oD ➨ ЯEDVERS 22:06, 15 October 2006 (UTC) on behalf of Big Brother.[reply]

I guessed it was a joke :o) Nevertheless, the requirement for further hard work from you still exists. Don't slack now. Come on, get editing! Chop chop! :o) ➨ ЯEDVERS 22:15, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno. I just see people pissing away grad school and law school. Kind of sad, really. Arthur Ellis 14:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk:Arthur EllisArthur Ellis awards this Barnstar to **Bucketsofg** who is probably nice to kids and dogs, but may need more Vitamin D.

Vandalism by user:81.86.132.31

Hi, I would appreciate it if you could please look into recent repeated vandalism by 81.86.132.31. The use has a history of making personal attacks as well as being blocked for vandalism before by you. The user has been given may warnings. Recent blatant vandalism: [1], [2] Repeated deletion of Wikipedia content without stating any reason: [3], [4], [5], [6] Thank you. Nazli 14:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for looking into the matter. Nazli 16:33, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming by 63.80.97.254 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Why did you not block/ban this user? Final warning was given on 27 Sept 06 by User:AbsolutDan. How can two "final" warnings be needed? -Seidenstud 04:44, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would usually agree with you, except in the case that it is the exact same m.o. It seems that someone who drops by every couple of weeks and spams 4 or 5 pages before being noticed (as has been the case with this spammer) can easily escape consequences for an extended length of time.... -Seidenstud 04:51, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heads-up

I blocked Arthur Ellis for calling Fred Bauder a nazi on the Rachel Marsden arb workshop. He didn't take it well. [7] Thatcher131 16:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:203.94.140.244

I changed the block on this user from one week to one month, stating: If they come back after a week long block just to vandalize, what difference would another week make?

Just wanted to let you know.

Nishkid64 01:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Marsden, in reply

I'm sure you are following the arbitration as closely as anyone. You are certainly more familiar with the subject that I am. I'll rely on you to do what you think is right. If, acting in good faith, you can't produce a neutral article, then I will support stubbing it and letting other editors see what they can do. Tom Harrison ^Talk 23:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

I really didn't change anything on..anything! Look I just started, I don't even know how! Beleive me, I'm not intrested in having a bunch of people blame me falsely. Thanks.

From, user:your face

what exactly is grewal? oh and i just wanted to tell you, i'm sort of new here, and didn't know that nonsense articles aren't allowed, i just thought they'd put it the "bad jokes & other deleted nonsense" section, but i guess not... so, sorry. please forgive me? Your Face

From happy8

Buckets! i've got a job for you! go to the article transwiki and there's a message saying it needs expert help, something about a backlog. will you please fix the article?

Helen Keller

I think you've been more than patient with the vandal and a block is certainly in order; probably won't take much though, he's probably up past his bedtime as it is :) --Doc Tropics ^{Message in a bottle} 00:44, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]