User talk:Brysonjett

heyy

September 2019

Hello, I'm Inter. An edit that you recently made to Anderson County, Kentucky seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Oz\^InterAct 14:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Burgin, Kentucky. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Burgin, Kentucky was changed by Brysonjett (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950726 on 2019-09-12T14:11:40+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:11, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brysonjett, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Brysonjett! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Coleman (basketball). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Aranya (talk) 03:19, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Aranya

Hello, Brysonjett. You have new messages at Aranya's talk page.
Message added 21:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

– Aranya (talk) 21:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Typo Team, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. – Aranya (talk) 18:13, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to European colonization of the Americas—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:07, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to European colonization of the Americas. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:07, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to European colonization of the Americas, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Brysonjett

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Brysonjett, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheImaCow (talk) 15:23, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (it was my friend making these changes and I had him stop I should not be getting punished for someone elses stupidity.) --Brysonjett (talk) 15:44, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 15:50, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is incredibly stupid of you to block me of someone elses actions. It is also sad that you work at wikipedia.

We're all volunteers. But this doesn't convince me that I shouldn't block you indefinitely. Doug Weller talk 17:23, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You know what its fine im sorry thank you for taking time out of your day to make this website better. Also im I forever blocked from making any edits on wikipediia now?

Adding obscene statements like this on the user page of the admins who recently blocked you will probably not help matters. He iro 13:52, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean?Brysonjett (talk) 13:54, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I mean suggesting an admin molests their mother on their userpage is probably going to get this disruptive account blocked. Also, please stop your editwar at Dillon Carmichael, that statement per WP:BLP, WP:UNDUE and WP:CITE needs to be sourced. He iro 14:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pleae tell me when I suggested an admin to assault or abuse "Molests" their mother?

See this diff He iro 14:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You think that was me? How would I edit his user page?

The same way one edits any other page on wikipedia. That specific edit was you restoring a previous vandals 4 year old edit that had been reverted. Enough with the nonsense. Final warning. He iro 14:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well I went to Doug Weller Page and I didnt see anything that said to go Molest his mother?

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

Heiro 16:02, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SypherPk moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, SypherPk, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 15:27, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it has to meet WP:Notability (people) which can be very difficult I'm afraid. I don't think the Essentially Sports blog meets WP:RS, but you could ask at WP:RSN. Doug Weller talk 15:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you! Where can I find my draftspace?

Draft:SypherPk. Sign your talk page posts with 4 tildes eg ~~~~ Doug Weller talk 17:44, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=your reason here}}. Drmies (talk) 16:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What did I do to get blocked?Brysonjett (talk) 16:20, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you might want to ping Drmies. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:05, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean ping?Brysonjett (talk) 17:09, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I mean using the {{ping}} template, e.g. {{ping|Drmies}}. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What does the ping template do?Brysonjett (talk) 17:22, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, FFS, like this @Drmies:. He should be along eventually to answer your question. He iro 17:24, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think saying For Fucks Sake to a 13 year old was appropiate?Brysonjett (talk) 17:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC) @Heironymous Rowe[reply]

If you want to get unblocked, just ping Drmies and follow the instructions in the block notice. ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 17:39, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brysonjett (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Drmies: I am asking for you to unblock me, I dont know what it was that I did wrong but I assure you that I will no longer do it, I will only make edits that are helpful to the article from now on so may you please get back to me and think about lifting the block thanks!!

Decline reason:

Based on observing your edits to this page alone I find your request totally unconvincing. Tiderolls 18:00, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Haha, you claim you're 13, you don't know what you did to get blocked but you won't do it again, and you're sitting around here just trolling. You were blocked for, essentially, "I don't know what the fuck you are doing here but you're wasting our time and server space". I tried to look for a positive edit you made, but this isn't even in proper English. So no. User:Heironymous Rowe, good to see you--hope you are well. Drmies (talk) 18:11, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow your so scary you probably dont even know what lacrosse is and boy are you tough shooting shit at a 13 yr old SCARY

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:25, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:SypherPk

Hello, Brysonjett. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SypherPk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]