User talk:Bruce PlantID

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Bruce PlantID. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Whpq (talk) 22:31, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As my intro says, I'm interested in providing illustrated ID tips for plants.

This involves assigning scientific names (IDs) to photos. How does Wikipedia evaluate the accuracy of these IDs?

Perhaps this has been discussed somewhere at Wikipedia, but I haven't found it yet.

At PlantID.net (my website), I evaluate the reputation of the photographer for ID accuracy. Most of my 100,000 ID photos are from a dozen or so generally acclaimed photographers who share their work on https://calphotos.berkeley.edu/.

For my own photos in a new Crepis vesicaria subsp. taraxacifolia Wikipedia article I'm writing, I was able to key the plant given my specific location, using citable authorities (Flowering Plants of Edgewood Natural Preserve by Toni Corelli, with Natural Resources Database (NRDB.org) confirming plants known to exist there. I then had a head weeder at Edgewood (this is one of his target plants) visually confirm my photos.

Does that sound like what I should be doing?

Bruce PlantID (talk) 13:52, 20 May 2019 (UTC)Bruce PlantID[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Gutierrezia sarothrae flower detail (fair use).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gutierrezia sarothrae flower detail (fair use).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:18, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just make things clear since these template messages can be confusing, WP:NFCC#1 on replaceability means that an image is deemed replaceable even if you can't find a free image if somebody could make a free image of the subject. Also, considering your interests, you might want to join WikiProject Plants. Regards -- Whpq (talk) 22:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Guiterrezia sarothrae phyllaries.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Guiterrezia sarothrae phyllaries.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:30, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gutierrezia sarothrae branches dying back (Fair Use).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gutierrezia sarothrae branches dying back (Fair Use).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gutierrezia sarothrae lower leaves (fair use).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gutierrezia sarothrae lower leaves (fair use).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]