User talk:BrookieWookie13

Welcome!

Welcome	to	Wikipedia!
ICCE2020!

I've noticed some of your contributions and I want to say hello!
Have a look at the links below if you want to learn more about editing Wikipedia:
Introduction	Navigating Wikipedia	Editing Wikipedia articles
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia	Writing your very first article	HELP ME!
Here are some of the basic Wikipedia policies that you should be aware of:
Be BOLD!	Assume good faith	Be civil and polite
Don't infringe copyright	Vandals aren't nice	Don't get blocked
If you need any more help, visit the Teahouse for friendly help from other editors, or go on the Wikipedia Adventure for a fun and interactive way of learning about Wikipedia.
And if you still have unanswered questions, click this link to ask a question, and someone will come to help you soon.

Seagull123 Φ 17:48, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ICCE2020! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 01:56, Monday, August 17, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Scott D. Miller, Ph.D. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Scott D. Miller, Ph.D., does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 03:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

Courtesy link: Draft:Scott D. Miller, Ph.D.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I'm working to create this wikipedia page Draft: Scott D. Miller, Ph.D. I have interviewed several people and collected the resources, but it looks like I need better sources to confirm the information. I've been trying to read about what I need to change, but would be so appreciative of any specific feedback you can give me about what further sourcing is required to publish. ICCE2020 (talk) 17:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ICCE2020, I suggest reading this page about writing a Wikipedia article, and also this introduction to referencing. Also, on Wikipedia, everything needs to be verifiable using reliable sources, so unless your interviews have been published in such reliable sources, these interviews are unlikely to be acceptable on Wikipedia as references - see WP:OR.

For the draft, you should try and insert references as inline citations - the ones which appear like in the article like this:^[1]. Also, many of the references currently come from Miller's own website - see WP:SPS for why this should be avoided: please try and find secondary sources if possible. Try the reference desk if you need help finding some.

I haven't read the draft thoroughly, but having had a skim-read of it, it appears that it may be promotional (eg: He has also traveled the world, teaching workshops and providing consultations ... always with the goal of helping to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of mental health services. and Stay up-to-date with his latest work by subscribing to his, “Top Performance Blog”). Wikipedia isn't the place for promotion/advertising, so if you submit the draft as it currently is, it will most likely be rejected. Please remove anything that could be considered promotional - keeping in mind Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy (WP:NPOV). As it does sound promotional, I have to ask that if you have a conflict of interest (COI) with Miller, you should read Wikipedia's policy on COIs (here's a simple guide to the policy; and here's a list of help available to editors with COIs), and you must disclose it - especially if you are paid to edit.

In summary: read this page about writing a Wikipedia article; read this introduction to referencing; find more/better references, try the reference desk if you need help with this; remove promotional material; and if you have a connection of some sort with Miller, read Wikipedia's COI policy. Seagull123 Φ 17:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Scott D. Miller (psychologist) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Scott D. Miller (psychologist). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:40, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott D. Miller (psychologist) (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This page appears to have been written to praise its subject rather than to describe the subject neutrally. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view.

If this draft is resubmitted without being reworked, it may be nominated for deletion. You may ask for advice about the tone of articles at the Teahouse.

Does the author of this draft have any sort of financial or other connection with the subject of this draft? Please read the conflict of interest policy and the paid editing policy and make any required declarations.

You may ask for advice about conflict of interest at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without addressing the question about conflict of interest, it may be Rejected or nominated for deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scott D. Miller (psychologist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Scott D. Miller (psychologist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ICCE2020! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username. It also appears that your account is intended to be used for the purpose of telling the world about an organization, person or cause that you consider worthwhile. Unfortunately, many good causes are not sufficiently notable for their own Wikipedia article, and all users are discouraged from editing in any area where they have an inherent conflict of interest. You may wish to consider one of these alternative outlets.

While user names that are the names of organizations are not permitted, you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Foundation", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87". Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

Thank you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

|BrookieWookie13]]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

BrookieWookie13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Montanacowgirl2020 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am requesting to have my username changed from ICCE2020 - I am a voluntary member of the ICCE that is trying to complete my first wiki article about Feedback Informed Treatment, Deliberate Practice, and it's founder Scott D. Miller. I am not being paid to do this, believe the subject matter is notable and can provide a variety of reliable resources. I am open to any feedback to improve the article, but don't want to lose the work already done. Is it possible to have the draft:Scott D. Miller page moved to the new username? I already applied for the new username, so I'm hoping that doesn't cause a conflict. ICCE2020 (talk) 2:55 pm, 9 September 2020, last Wednesday (3 days ago) (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

SOmeone, presumably you, registered that account this past week. If unblocked what will you edit that is not related to Miller or any other area that you have a conflict of interest with? We're not going to unblock you just to edit about Miller. only (talk) 02:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

BrookieWookie13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Montanacowgirl2020 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Thanks so much for your reply. It is evident that there is much to be learned about editing in wikipedia. I would like to continue to be able to educate myself further, continue with the tutorials etc. Edit other areas of interest. Given that errors were made with my lack of experience, I would like the opportunity to correct them. Is that an option?

Decline reason:

As identified in the last decline, that username is not currently available. Please select a different one. Do not attempt to actually create a new account, just identify a new user name and an admin will do the rest. Additionally, please identify more specifically what articles you are interested in editing if you are to be unblocked. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:44, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

BrookieWookie13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

BrookieWookie13 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Thank you for your information. I am thinking I would edit articles that I am interested in but have no affiliation with. Articles on breeds of horses, reining, dressage, that type of thing. I want to get more familiar with the editing and writing process on wikipedia. I'd like to complete the tutorials as well. ICCE2020 (talk) 22:19, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Accept reason:

globally renamed ICCE2020 to BrookieWookie13 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:55, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Good Morning - I am writing because my username has been blocked due to it representing an organization that I am a volunteer member of - the ICCE. I am new to Wikipedia and attempted to write my first article. I read articles before hand, but still changes need to be made. I am mental health therapist that uses Feedback Informed Treatment (FIT) which is a way of working with clients that tracks outcomes. This is an important topic for clinicians in my field. My first article was written about the founder of FIT, Scott D. Miller. Although I did not write the article alone, I wrote it and reviewed it with several other colleagues, it was ear marked as being promotional. I am happy to disclose that I do know Scott, as he has done much of my clinical training in FIT, but I am NOT being paid for this work. I would like to continue the editing process but was quickly blocked. I have appealed it, but have not heard anything back. I am new, so am making mistakes and have not intentionally broken any guidelines that I am aware of. I have requested a new username which solely represents myself, but don't want to lose the work that is being done. Is there any way to get a quick response. Honestly, the block came so fast, I feel a bit confused as to why the matter isn't being addressed as quickly. Any feedback would be very much appreciated.

take care, Brooke ICCE2020 (talk) 16:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have closed your helpme tag, as you have an open block appeal. Please be patient, there is no need to hurry, as rome was neither built on one day. Note that "compensation" in the WP:PAID rules is not limited to money. See also meta:Terms of use/FAQ on paid contributions without disclosure Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

globally renamed ICCE2020 to BrookieWookie13

globally renamed ICCE2020 to BrookieWookie13 --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Scott D. Miller (psychologist)

Hello, BrookieWookie13. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Scott D. Miller (psychologist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 11:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Scott D. Miller (psychologist)

Hello, BrookieWookie13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Scott D. Miller".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi BrookieWookie13! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:58, Thursday, April 8, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Feedback informed treatment (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Feedback informed treatment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Feedback informed treatment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 08:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Feedback informed treatment has been accepted

Feedback informed treatment, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scott D. Miller (psychologist) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Scott D. Miller (psychologist), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs to show that it meeta the criteria at WP:PROF. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 22:16, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott D. Miller (psychologist) (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rollidan were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources given discuss the field of study for this individual, not the individual himself. Needs sources that how the individual is notable. Rollidan (talk) 21:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scott D. Miller (psychologist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Scott D. Miller (psychologist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rollidan (talk) 21:29, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Scott D. Miller (psychologist)

Hello, BrookieWookie13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Scott D. Miller".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:32, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scott D. Miller, Ph.D. moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Scott D. Miller, Ph.D., is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 20:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott D. Miller, Ph.D. (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scott D. Miller, Ph.D. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott D. Miller, Ph.D. (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sourcing is insufficient to indicate that he meets biographic notability. Note Draft:Scott D. Miller (psychologist) also exists and has been declined without issues being addressed. Appears to be part of a walled garden.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scott D. Miller, Ph.D. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 03:19, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, BrookieWookie13. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Scott D. Miller, Ph.D., you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. You seem to be editing extensively about Miller and his work. Please disclose your COI as has been requested before or you will be blocked again. Star Mississippi 03:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Scott D. Miller (psychologist)

Hello, BrookieWookie13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Scott D. Miller".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:47, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Scott D. Miller, Ph.D.

Hello, BrookieWookie13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scott D. Miller, Ph.D., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]