User talk:Bronco252525

Charles Albright

Could you please add a verifiable source to the Charles Albright article containing his date of death? There may be nothing wrong with the article reference you added, but EU users cannot access the reference, nor is there currently a web cached version. Thank you. Regards, --Kieronoldham (talk) 20:33, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about. Albright died on August 22, not September. Bronco252525 (talk) 03:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Myself and Martinevans123 were simply requesting a reference that can be verifiable to others via the web in other geographical locations. See the talk on the Albright article. Surely not too much to ask. Thanks. Regards, --Kieronoldham (talk) 05:35, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you able to address the concerns outlined a week ago? A week has passed.--Kieronoldham (talk) 03:35, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about Bronco252525 (talk) 17:07, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Bronco252525 (talk) 16:07, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gerald Bordelon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not add images that violate Copyvio. You have been warned about this already. Inexpiable (talk) 19:42, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about. Bronco252525 (talk) 19:54, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You literally delete everything I upload. You can’t even make me upload a picture of Gerald Bordelon Bronco252525 (talk) 19:56, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file you uploaded is a copyright violation. You cannot upload it onto the website, you do not own that file which is why it keeps getting deleted and reverted. Continue doing so and you risk getting banned. In simple terms, that photo does not belong to you, therefore you can't upload it so stop. Inexpiable (talk) 10:19, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I literally took a screenshot of it. And what is the file copyrighted by? Bronco252525 (talk) 14:23, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AlexLovesCookies

Hello Bronco252525,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged AlexLovesCookies for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:33, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AlexLovesCookies

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on AlexLovesCookies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sdrqaz (talk) 17:37, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:09, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bronco252525 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here Okay. Look. I'm sorry for doing that. And what is the damn reason to freaking block me from editing? Is there a problem on uploading something?Bronco252525 (talk) 19:38, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I could not find a single constructive edit you made, and I found plenty of unconstructive and often deeply inappropriate edits. Please point to a single constructive edit you made. Yamla (talk) 20:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well no shit, I got blocked from editing. I did nothing wrong, and Bbbastard23 is literally blocking everyone on wiki Bronco252525 (talk) 23:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn’t do anything wrong dude. I swear to Christ I didn’t do anything Bronco252525 (talk) 17:13, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I'm sorry. Literally did nothing to deserve this

So you decided to block me over me making something? Like, what the hell did I do to deserve that? I literally didn't do crap.

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:16, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]