User talk:Brocicle/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Brocicle. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Happy Holidays!
To You and Yours! LLArrow (talk) 19:05, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- @LLArrow: Thank you! Hope you have a safe and happy holidays and all the best for the new year! 15:52, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
re: this, whoops, sorry! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:06, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
- It is sourced, if you read the article Lucy Hale confirmed the rumours of a movie. Rumours = possibility, not 'deceiving' at all. Brocicle (talk) 22:09, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Television episode summaries
The 350 word summaries that you are referring to apply when {{Episode list}} is not being used. The instructions for {{Episode list}} state that |ShortSummary=
should be "A short 100–200 word plot summary of the episode", not 350 words. Please note that this has been discussed at length, but if you wish to change it, please feel free to discuss it on the template's talk page. By all means, remove the plot tags from episodes that have episode summaries less than 200 words long, but do not remove them from episodes that do not comply with template instructions. --AussieLegend (✉) 14:21, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
@Brocicle - X-Men
You cannot just delete a large amount of information without providing a suitable reason.
"reverting to last good version" is not a good enough reason without a reason why this version is not good.
I looked over what you deleted, and this information was accurate, no vandalism.
I am restoring this information, and if you're deleting it again, can you give a good reason please?? — Preceding Comment added by TruthTeller (talk) 11:32, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
- @86.46.232.121: I and other editors have already given a good reason. Many editors have reverted your added information but you refuse to listen or read the comments that multiple editors have left. It doesn't have to be vandalism to be removed. Brocicle (talk) 12:15, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Pretty Little Liars Characters
Hello, can you give your opinion on the new discussion I made on here? List of Pretty Little Liars characters or 5 episodes = Recurring?| talk page. Thank you. Bernnardo (talk) 22:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Charmed credit list
Few yearsa ago, consensus is made about credit list. Holly is first because she is the only cast member who appeared in every single episode, including unaired pilot, followed by Alyssa, Rose and Shannen. Several members agrred, that is why i am reverting your edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex Visekruna (talk • contribs) 16:55, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- If you read the talk page the "consensus" isn't valid as it was improperly done. MOS:TV states that a parent article (Charmed} list cast members in the starring section as they are billed on screen with new regular main cast added to the end. If you want to actually reach a consensus feel free to re-open the discussion on the talk page. As I said, the consensus is invalid. Please remember to sign your comments. Brocicle (talk) 16:59, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- In addition to being made with little input and improperly closed, the discussion you're referring to didn't account for WP:MOS:TV § Cast and characters information. I suggest you read WP:CONSENSUS. Note especially that "[e]ditors may propose a change to current consensus, especially to raise previously unconsidered arguments or circumstances." Here, Brocicle has come forward with a guideline-backed reason for his edits; you cannot stand on a years-old discussion to oppose it. Rebbing 17:14, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters
Boxes are usefull but episode count arent Judor92 (talk) 18:13, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- How are boxes useful? The serve no purpose whatsoever. Brocicle (talk) 20:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
American Horror Story (season 6)
Hi! I'd really appreciate you weighing in on this discussion. Thanks :)! LLArrow (talk) 20:04, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Brocicle. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)