User talk:BrittniG2445

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Nazca Lines appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 17:13, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks as if you have had some feedback from a Wikipedia editor. I'll have a look and see if I can discern what happened. Of course, all content should conform to Wikipedia standards. It looks as if an editor had little patience for consideration of ancient aliens theory, which is something about which editors are likely to be vigilant. Do you know what the problem was? Is it something you will be able to address? One thing to try might be a section devoeted to pseudoarchaeology associated with the Nasca lines. Hoopes (talk) 02:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to your article on Mama Oqllu, it looks as if you neglected to check and see whether there is already an article on this topic. There is, spelled Mama Ocllo, first created in September 2002. My recommendation is that you find a way to insert the content from the article that you created into the existing article and then delete the new one. That will avoid redundancy and confusion between the two. When editing or creating Wikipedia entries, it is always good practice to check the existing content of Wikipedia to see what has already been created. Differences in spelling can be fixed and accomodated with redirection coding. Hoopes (talk) 02:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]