User talk:BritneySpearsAddict

Thank you for experimenting with the page Long Road Out of Eden on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - eo 15:46, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Long Road Out of Eden page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - eo 15:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Long Road Out of Eden, you will be blocked from editing. - eo 15:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Piece of Me. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - eo 21:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Piece of Me, you will be blocked from editing. - eo 21:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:244.mullaly.megan.092806.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:244.mullaly.megan.092806.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Genisock2 (talk) 21:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Britney Spears

Please do not remove the entire Personal Struggles section in the article without having a thorough discussion. Oops!...I did it again (talk) 06:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Britney Spears82.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Britney Spears82.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 23:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Britney Spears articles and neutrality

Your username indicates that you may not be able to keep the goals of Wikipedia foremost when dealing with articles pertaining to Britney Spears. I suggest you remember two core policies of Verifiablity and Neutral Point of View. Pairadox (talk) 02:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jive Records, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Momusufan (talk) 21:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FINAL warning

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. I refer to the nonsense at "Millionaire Matchmaker." --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing deletion tags from articles is really, really not recommended. Do not do it again. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Britney-Spears01.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Britney-Spears01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 16:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Britney-Spears07.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Britney-Spears07.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 16:07, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blackout (Britney Spears album)

Britney Spears' "Blackout" album has NOT been certified Gold by the RIAA. Until "Blackout" is certified by the RIAA, if ever, please refrain from editing Wikipedia pages to reflect such certification. Thank you. 71.141.155.99 (talk) 16:52, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Britney Spears Untitled Sixth Studio Album

A tag has been placed on Britney Spears Untitled Sixth Studio Album, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This page, and ones similarly named for the same item, has been deleted on multiple occasions already but seems to be constantly recreated

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MrMarmite (talk) 05:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sixth Studio Album

A tag has been placed on Sixth Studio Album, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

a) redirects to a page that has been deleted on many occasions and b) many artists have a sixth studio album

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MrMarmite (talk) 05:34, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Britney Spears Womanizer Cover(HQ).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Britney Spears Womanizer Cover(HQ).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:BritneySpearsWomanizer2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BritneySpearsWomanizer2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pink Funhouse Cover rgb.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pink Funhouse Cover rgb.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Realist² 01:36, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Life Would Suck Without You

Hi
Please stop linking to My Life Would Suck Without You. It can't be created at this point since the target is protected, and it also shouldn'tbe created since it was already discussed and deleted following WP:Articles for deletion/My Life Would Suck Without You. Linking it is not helpful while that consensus is still valid. Please wait at least until the single charts. Thanks.
Amalthea 21:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to If U Seek Amy, you will be blocked from editing. — R ² 04:41, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of File:100britney.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:100britney.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:File:100britney.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AngelOfSadness talk 15:43, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]