User talk:Britnbecca

Welcome!

Hello, Britnbecca, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 03:00, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Britnbecca. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Lawrence L. Langer, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. At Talk:Lawrence L. Langer, you implied that you were in contact with him. What is your affiliation with him? Joseph2302 (talk) 21:21, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, note that the article is not yours or Lawrence's, it's the community's. Neither you nor Lawrence have authority on what can be written on the page. Please read our guide for users with a conflict of interest. Thanks, Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 14:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, I'm Joseph2302. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lawrence L. Langer, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. If the facts that you are adding are true, they need to be accompanied by reliable sources. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:04, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and respond re COI

Hi Britnbecca, I work on conflict of interest issues in Wikipedia and was brought by the posting at the noticeboard mentioned above,

Based on this and your editing, you clearly have some connection with the subject of our Lawrence L. Langer article.

As in academia, where Langer worked, in Wikipedia it is essential that we manage conflicts of interest. I am sure Langer himself would agree with this. You have already been provided with the formal COI notice above but you are ignoring it, so let me try to work with you some more.

As in academia, COI is managed here two ways First by disclosure, and then by a form of peer review. First things first. While I am not asking you to disclose your identity (anonymity is strictly protecting by out WP:OUTING policy) would you please disclose if you have some relationship with Langer? You can answer how ever you wish, but whatever the relationship is with him, please disclose it. After you respond (and you can just reply below), perhaps we can talk a bit about editing Wikipedia, to give you some more orientation to how this place works, and to how the peer review part of it works. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 15:23, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]