User talk:BrionyH

Welcome to Wellcome and the vexed question of Wikipedia. Andrew D. (talk) 12:00, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, BrionyH, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Andrew D. (talk) 12:00, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Thank you for expanding Ivy Evelyn Woodward. Message me if need help. I'll look out for your edits. It's confusing when your new but you appear to be doing well. Whispyhistory (talk) 19:37, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

fadedgenes

Sorry but that's not a reliable source. You will have to remove it and anything you added based on it that you can't source another way. Have you tried familysearch.org ? Philafrenzy (talk) 10:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - am totally new to this! All of the details are also based on census, birth and death records which I access via Ancestry.co.uk (given in sources section), so I can remove the citation and not have to get rid of any content BrionyH (talk) 11:26, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, can you live link any of it using familysearch? It requires a subscription but its free unlike Ancestry. There's a fine line between using primary sources to support secondary sources, and falling down the genealogical rabbit hole and having an article largely made up of primary sources with an excessive level of detail. I think you could trim back a bit on the sibling dates and also on her job titles as it's making the article a tough read in parts. We also don't normally capitalise job titles. Otherwise, coming along nicely. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:23, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, will trim back and get rid of capitals. Nothing comes up on familysearch...BrionyH (talk) 17:56, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ivy Evelyn Woodward

On 2 February 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ivy Evelyn Woodward, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1909, Ivy Woodward became the first female member of the Royal College of Physicians? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ivy Evelyn Woodward. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ivy Evelyn Woodward), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isabella Skinner Clarke–Keer has been accepted

Isabella Skinner Clarke–Keer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 09:51, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frances Elizabeth Deacon has been accepted

Frances Elizabeth Deacon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elsie Higgon has been accepted

Elsie Higgon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-- RoySmith (talk) 04:36, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eudora Ibiam (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources are insufficient to establish notability of the subject. The Dictionary of African Christian Biography one doesn't even mention her. The Gathogo one does, but not in significant extent or depth. I cannot check the only remaining one (Njoku), but in any case it alone wouldn't be enough, as WP:GNG requires significant coverage in multiple sources. --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eudora Ibiam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eudora Ibiam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BrionyH! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:04, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eudora Ibiam (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional sources are insufficient to meet the notability concerns.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eudora Ibiam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Eudora Ibiam, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:35, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eudora Ibiam

Hello, BrionyH. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eudora Ibiam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eudora Ibiam

Hello, BrionyH. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eudora Ibiam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]