User talk:BrightsForever

Welcome!

Hello, BrightsForever, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 04:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Page publishing

I was in middle of edit of newly created Wikipedia page for 'Astrophile Thai Series'. I have added necessary citation and reference accordingly. When the same would be reviewed and published? BrightsForever (talk) 04:34, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Astrophile Thai Series

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Astrophile Thai Series. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Astrophile (TV series). Because of the duplication, your article has been speedily deleted. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Astrophile (TV series). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think the article you created should have remained separate, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I placed the request to delete Astrophile TV Series & retain the Current Astrophile Thai Series. Now their is duplicate of work. Not sure which one to edit and add citation BrightsForever (talk) 04:38, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed it, there is now only one page, Astrophile (TV series), which is the appropriate tile, I've merged the history of both versions as well. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for merging the topic

I will edit the tone as suggested and submit it for review. BrightsForever (talk) 04:50, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "BrightsForever", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 05:39, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I confirm this name don't belong to any organization or logo. It's a imaginary name BrightsForever (talk) 06:08, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

However I will consider your advice to make it more discreet BrightsForever (talk) 06:12, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I Sea U (Thai TV Series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, I Sea U (Thai TV Series), is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, click the Submit the draft for review! button atop the article. YouTube and social media are not reliable sources. Silikonz💬 22:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Silikonz - There was maintainence error, hence references/ citation was not visible, please note maintain authentic citations and references added BrightsForever (talk) 22:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: I Sea U (Thai TV Series) (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube and Twitter are generally considered unreliable sources! Please replace with reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:I Sea U (Thai TV Series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tails Wx 16:59, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BrightsForever! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tails Wx 16:59, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Bright Vachirawit Chivaaree.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bright Vachirawit Chivaaree.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:41, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Bright as singer.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bright as singer.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:46, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Tu Tontawan Tantivejakul Official Poster. Fair Use.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Tu Tontawan Tantivejakul Official Poster. Fair Use.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:48, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Young Bright Playing Guitar. Fair Use.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Young Bright Playing Guitar. Fair Use.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:59, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Davika Hoorne. Fair Use.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Davika Hoorne. Fair Use.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:01, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Astrostuff Charity.Fair Use.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Astrostuff Charity.Fair Use.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:12, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Using Template:Di-replaceable non-free use disputed‎

If you want to use Template:Di-replaceable non-free use disputed‎, you shouldn't edit the template's page itself; instead, you should add the template's syntax to the relevant file's page. Go to the relevant file's page, click "Edit" at the top of the page and then add the syntax {{di-replaceable non-free use disputed|your reason here}} to the top of the page. Make sure you add your reason for disputing the replaceable non-free use where it says "your reason here". Once you've done that, click "Show preview" to check to see if everything is OK, and then click "Publish changes" if it is. -- 07:01, 11 March 2023 (UTC) Marchjuly (talk) 07:01, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop directly editing the template's page now. Read the instructions given above or on the template's page if you want to use it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:07, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks. This is first time I'm using dispute template. So the reasoning on top of the article using syntax is the method right. BrightsForever (talk) 07:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This template is used in the same way you would use any other template: you add the syntax to the page where you want to use it and then you fill in the "parts" of the template that need to be completed. In this case, the only "part" you need to fill in is "your reason here". -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:15, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please re-read the instructions given on the template's page or in my first post above. You use this template by adding it to file pages; this template shouldn't be added to articles. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:47, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I recently added details in description page of the picture. Hope I did it correctly this time. I want to follow the protocol. BrightsForever (talk) 08:16, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Please try not to overuse WP:MINOR when editing. Some of your edits to Vachirawit Chivaaree don't really seem to be "minor" edits per WP:MINOR#What not to mark as minor changes. Please also check to make surely you haven't accidentally checked "This is a minor edit" when editing. You don't need to go back and try to "fix" any previous edits, but you should try and check to make sure from here on. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:26, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Got it. I will be mindful BrightsForever (talk) 15:11, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vachirawit Chivaaree, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pop. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BrightsForever (talk) 23:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Old Days

Hi. The appropriate disambiguated title for the article should be Good Old Days (Thai TV series). There was already a previous article at that title, so I restored that page and moved the content from your newer version there. Please continue editing there and update your watchlist as needed, thank you. --Paul_012 (talk) 21:46, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul, the series name is 'Good Old Days', if that article was under deletion for inappropriate content (last edit on Sep 2022, which admin deleted on October 2022), wouldn't be right to give credit to the original writer, by deleting the inappropriate one & editing the current title name? BrightsForever (talk) 22:04, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Plus, Masaya is extremely troublesome user, who has history of deleting others work or resetting admins deletion or comments. It's like user works on Monopoly by discarding others work. Check history status on all her work specially Metawin Opas-iamkajorn. BrightsForever (talk) 22:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paul, I genuinely request you to reconsider it, and merge it other way around. BrightsForever (talk) 22:17, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, given your concerns, I've reverted my edits and submitted a move request instead. Anyway, the previous version was merely redirected, not deleted. Such changes can be contested by anyone. The proper way to re-create the article in cases like this would have been to click the "Redirected from..." message that appears at the top of the page when you follow a redirected link, and edit the original page, rather than create a new one at a separate title. See Wikipedia:Redirect#How to edit a redirect or convert it into an article for details. --Paul_012 (talk) 22:40, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a ton for consideration Paul. Each day I'm learning something news, thanks again for guiding. This helps for improvement. BrightsForever (talk) 00:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AMA1. Fair Use.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AMA1. Fair Use.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chinese censorship abroad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:39, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I have deleted Vandalism article. The article is on cyber bully & other person.Refer: Vandalism: cyber bully, unrelated information represented under this movement. Article 6,7,8 nowhere mentioned that the stated artist was involved in insulting the country. Article talks about other person supposedly ex-girlfriend. Legal law suit filed by the production house on cyber bully. Refer: GMM files reports vs fans spreading malicious comments against their artists BrightsForever (talk) 19:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Due to overlapping glitch might have happened. Vandalism by publishing artist picture to damage his reputation on overly grossly exaggerated unrelated information. No where the article mentions on diplomatic disparity. BrightsForever (talk) 19:42, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Misrepresentation, grossly exaggerated information, reference of other individuals, attachment of the artist based on fan war is unconstructive. Refer: legal law suit filed by GMMTV BrightsForever (talk) 19:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On June 25, 2020, GMM Grammy, the parent company of GMMTV, where he is a talent, sent lawyers to the Technology Crime Unit to file lawsuits against social media users accused of spreading malicious messages BrightsForever (talk) 19:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you have reliable sources about that we can add them to our coverage, there isn't an option for taking away the current coverage though (its important and notable no matter what happened) Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:50, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Potential COI

Hello, BrightsForever. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Vachirawit Chivaaree, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have no direct affiliation with the artist, before editing any article I do my research. Not interested in any promotion, influence or drama. I randomly pick artist,and then on related works leads. Hence was familiar with this topic. Plus, Hongkong movement is infamous, it's a global news. Article claiming otherwise is a suprise. Refer Milk Tea Alliance Origin topic.BrightsForever (talk) 22:44, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cloud9 Entertainment for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cloud9 Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloud9 Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Os ari us 14:31, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is Public Domain Logo, however to avoid copyrigtht issue will upload it in Fair use. BrightsForever (talk) 14:35, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ASTRO Stuffs

Hello BrightsForever,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged ASTRO Stuffs for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MicrobiologyMarcus^{(petri dish•cultures)} 17:08, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Astro Stuff Logo - Fair Use.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Astro Stuff Logo - Fair Use.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:07, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cloud9 Entertainment.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cloud9 Entertainment. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloud9 Entertainment. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 04:55, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Talk:Cloud9 Entertainment. while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 06:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank. I noticed due to timeout I got logged out. I prefer making edits post login only BrightsForever (talk) 06:33, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cloud9 Entertainment Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cloud9 Entertainment Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:43, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrightsForever (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request you to unlock the blocks as this confusion is caused due to network glitch during article Cloud9 Entertainment only. I understand that agency is new and need more relevant work to appear on the Wikipedia page. There was no intention to advertise Bright Vachirawit through this article at all. All edits are made post discussions with the admins based on their previous feedback. I have contributed to other unrelated artists, articles and subject too, which got accepted as per wiki guideline. I request you to reconsider. BrightsForever (talk) 02:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will need to agree to abandon editing about this company and its clients and tell us what edits you will make instead. 331dot (talk) 08:54, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrightsForever (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I completely understand and agree on my errors that lead to my block, I will abandon writing on Cloud9 Entertainment and it's clients until they are tenure 1 year in the market with substantial work evidence. I will now edit only the confirmed work of the other articles involved. I will use authentic medium only. With minor changes on grammar or articles, updates on filmography and discography. I will contribute on confirmed projects only going forward.BrightsForever (talk) 20:58, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nope. That's not what 331dot said. You also haven't told us what you plan to work on instead. "Confirmed projects" is, at best, meaningless. Yamla (talk) 22:18, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrightsForever (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Indefinite expiry is inappropriate, as previously I did made decent contributions to confirmed projects like upcoming or released TV series, films, other actors, actresses from Thai and Chinese industries. This was my 1st attempt in creation of talent agency, which is hardly a month old, hence there was no major projects under this agency. Spamming/ advertising was mentioned, as there was reference on talent managed events details, which I now understand is insignificant to the subject's work. This lead to confusion, the same was not intentional. I don't have any vested interest on the subject, anything related is purely coincidence. I understand now that for creation of such agencies and companies, needs more wiki policies knowledge.

I will not create any more companies articles till I have studied the policies properly. I will refine my knowledge on the guidelines and policies on the topics in question. I will now focus only on articles based on my previously accepted contributions, where I have decent experience. I will only update released films based on their articles on reliable sources, justifying the claims made. Musics in filmography and discography paragraphs within the articles.

User created today vandalising article by adding deleting irrelevant words. Hence, request you to reconsider it, I'm ok if admins reconsider Indefinite expire to limited based expiry. BrightsForever (talk) 01:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Putting an end date on the block does nothing to demonstrate that you understand the reason for the block and will not repeat it. You won't be permitted to just wait out a block with an end date. You must show us that you understand these issues. You say you are looking at relevant policies- once you have, please demonstrate your knowledge in a new request. 331dot (talk) 09:57, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

FWIW, I do not think that the original block by Justlettersandnumbers for "Spam / advertising-only account", without any prior warning, was warranted. The user is clearly a fan of the actor, and their contributions are consistent with a fan editing articles related to their favourite actors and their work, which, in my understanding, does not by itself constitute spam. That said, I'm not vouching for them, and the situation is now complicated by the sockpuppetry issue. --Paul_012 (talk) 20:50, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'm not sure what's going on here. Sockpuppetry is new topic, however seen Sockmaster heading for baseless MULTIPLE accounts? This I will never accept because it is Never done. I honestly requested for spam unblock thinking I may have unintentionally gone wrong, I had willingness to correct. I was offline for professional formal reason. I was editing as a hobby. I am confused now with so many headings and my previous works getting disowned. Whatever the case I want prove to claims on Multiple accounts. How many is forums admin received? The count please

Request Unblock Misrepresentation

I see new heading & my user details have gone. I requested on removal spam block but denied. But this s multiple accounts misrepresentation is completely baseless and reputation damage. I need details of all account claimed to be mine. I will not at all accept this false informati I want to clear my name. Master of MULTIPLE account? Seriously? on. BrightsForever (talk) 22:17, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An admin (Bbb23) suspected that you created the account User:PowerLight1 to evade the previous block; this is known as WP:Sockpuppetry. To appeal, you should use the {{unblock}} template, same as the above. You should address both accusations: (1) that you have been using Wikipedia only for advertising or promotion, and (2) that you used the PowerLight1 account for block evasion. Remember to follow the instructions at WP:Guide to appealing blocks. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Adolescent - A Mini Album Poster. Fair Use.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Adolescent - A Mini Album Poster. Fair Use.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. v/r - Seawolf35 ^T--C 05:10, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate ban & article removal of ASTRO Stuffs and Adolescents (mini album) without notification or warning

I was blocked on Oct'23 for spamming, where as I have published artist's other related work with authentic report citations. However, in these 5 months I'm accused of duplicating account & ban invasion. Plus, my already approved works such as ASTRO Stuffs & Adolescent (mini album) is deleted without any warning. Who is auditing admins action. I'm blocked without any warning, accused without any warning & now my works deleted without any warning?? I'm busy with my personal professional work & had no time to properly appeal. But each time I login I find new drama. Who is ultimately responsible to alert or notify, I was never given opportunity to even explain BrightsForever (talk) 16:11, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request Unblock on tags

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrightsForever (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I am blocked for spam. I understand and my edit will not damage or disrupt the article. I will completely follow wiki policies. My previous update contributions were consistent with editing articles related to the artist and their works. No duplication or fanbased reports fanfiction will be promoted in the article. No social media references would be provided. No glossy exaggerated vocab usage will be made. My mistakes during new user stage shouldn't be overlapped with my latest consistent work. Request you to remove spam block. Sockpuppetry tag is incorrect, as I have not created any multiple accounts under my name. I'm complete unaware of any action made by other accounts. Any similarity to any other users is purely coincidence. I'm completely aware that I have not made any attempts & only authentically tried to removed spam block. I should not be held responsible here for actions of other party. I declare I have no connections with outside account claimed as sockpuppetry. I have only 1 account as BrightsForever. Request to unbiased look into both the matters and remove the blocks accordingly

Decline reason:

You were clearly told above that if you were unblocked, you would need to agree to not ever edit about Cloud9 Entertainment or its clients. At all. Period. You are clearly not willing to agree to that at this time, so I am going to revoke your talk page access. Further appeals, if you decide you would like to agree to that condition as presented and not with caveats or exceptions you add, may be made via WP:UTRS. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 09:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

BrightsForever (talk) 16:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GOD Thai story 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GOD Thai story 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GOD Thai story 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GOD Thai story 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GOD Thai story 3.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GOD Thai story 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GOD Thai story 4.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GOD Thai story 4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:08, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GOD Thai story 5.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GOD Thai story 5.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GOD Thai story 6.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GOD Thai story 6.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 22:10, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]