User talk:Brados5443545654

August 2022

Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Machine learning in video games—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 17:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Machine learning in video games. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 17:25, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Bitcoin network, you may be blocked from editing. LizardJr8 (talk) 17:28, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

who are you Brados5443545654 (talk) 17:56, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 18:00, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brados5443545654 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

im new to this platform i apologize for any problem i caused please unblock Brados5443545654 (talk) 18:08, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:12, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brados5443545654 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm sorry for editing and replacing sources (User made content) ,I will not tamper or mess up anymore paragraphs or anything else, I'm sorry please unblock me Thanks, Brados

Decline reason:

Please describe how your edits merited a block, what you would do diffrerntly, and what constructicve edits you'd make. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:19, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I may not be a blocking administrator, or even an administrator or even a well qualified editor, but I'm telling You frankly, there is almost no chance that will be accepted. You need a little more in your opinion, you must own you mistake and explain why it won't happen again which you did. But you also have to expalin how you are going to edit in the future, which you didn't do. I say you should rewrite it and send it and before putting it here, proofread it. N1TH Music (talk) 19:30, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I note, too, that for an administrator wanting to determine if the reasons for the block are understood, "i apologize for any problem i caused", is probably too vague to be reassuring. _signed,Willondon (talk) 20:07, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]