User talk:Brachy0008/Archive 3

License tagging for File:Juguang Platform.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Juguang Platform.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:30, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Juguang Platform.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Juguang Platform.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 14:36, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Just Dance 2023 Edition

The article Just Dance 2023 Edition you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Just Dance 2023 Edition for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Maplestrip -- Maplestrip (talk) 13:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cross Island MRT line

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cross Island MRT line you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 11:22, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Bayfront MRT station

On 26 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bayfront MRT station, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Bayfront MRT station in Singapore has public art that features ships powered by whales and dragons, hand-drawn by children? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bayfront MRT station. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Bayfront MRT station), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 12:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinions

If you really want a second opinion on Talk:Unit fraction/GA1, you need to request one following the instructions at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions#Asking for a second opinion. Leaving a review unfinished and stating in it that you are unable to decide whether some criteria are passed is less likely to work, and more likely to leave the review and the nomination sitting in limbo for months until someone else finally notices how long it's been sitting there. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:59, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cross Island MRT line

The article Cross Island MRT line you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Cross Island MRT line for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 11:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shalun light rail station has been accepted

Shalun light rail station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Unit fraction

On 26 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Unit fraction, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that exercises in the fair division of food (example pictured) are often used to teach unit fractions? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Unit fraction. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Unit fraction), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LET’S GOOOO Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 02:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

So you were on the list of adopters. I wanted to ask someone to adopt me but I felt like I needed to first build a portfoli of edits first. So far I have built three pages for the show Legends of Tomorrow. I am seeking for someone to help me improve these articles and make better ones going forward. OLI 06:18, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to adopt you, but I'm currently on a WikiBreak. I'll let you know once its over. Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 07:36, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

However, I have a bit of advice. Try to find as much sources as possible about the show. Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 07:39, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Thanks! Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 05:26, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Juguang Platform.jpeg

Hello, Brachy0008. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Juguang Platform.jpeg — was tagged with {{permission pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the VRT noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the VRT noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:34, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Doors (game) (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at List of Roblox games. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Does not appear to pass WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Doors (game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:15, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Canal station (CTA Metropolitan Main Line)/GA1

Brachy0008, you opened this GA review at the end of March, and haven't posted to it since the following day. Will you be returning to it, or should we find a new GA reviewer to take over? Please ping me to let me know. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BlueMoonset I'll be continuing it soon. Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 09:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"WikiVandal" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect WikiVandal has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 17 § WikiVandal until a consensus is reached. Voxl (talk) 20:59, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bishan MRT station

Hello, Brachy0008. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Bishan MRT station at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome!

Hi Brachy0008, I've removed three paragraphs from "Artworks" to the talk page; this text is off-topic for the article; see the article's talk for a fuller explanation. Good luck with your planned FA nom. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 00:45, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you adopt me?

I want to learn more policies about wikipedia than just reverting vandalism. TheCarch (talk) 00:18, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not able to take in adoptions for now. Sorry about that. Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 06:57, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. TheCarch (talk) 00:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aurat (word) has been accepted

Aurat (word), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 17:07, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

)

Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 02:01, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Outram Park MRT station

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Outram Park MRT station you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 14:21, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Outram Park MRT station

The article Outram Park MRT station you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Outram Park MRT station and Talk:Outram Park MRT station/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 15:43, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

hi. Brachy08 (Talk)(Contribs) 23:51, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Outram Park MRT station

The article Outram Park MRT station you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Outram Park MRT station for comments about the article, and Talk:Outram Park MRT station/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Voorts -- Voorts (talk) 02:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]