User talk:Boyd Reimer

Boyd Reimer (talk) 14:24, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

		The Resilient Barnstar
		Awarded to Boyd Reimer for his admirable diligence in bringing a difficult section of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights up to standard. Civilaffairs (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Civilaffairs

Thank you. Two heads are better than one. Boyd Reimer (talk) 13:01, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

1. Thanks for the heads up on the vandalism on the Robin Long story. Also I'm in the process of writing an article on war resister Travis Bishop. Once it is completed, I would appreciate any editing/improving you could do on it. Thanks! --Jmbranum (talk) 05:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I'll see what I can do. Boyd Reimer (talk) 23:57, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

		The Business and Economics Barnstar
		I hereby award this barnstar to Boyd Reimer for improving Tobin Tax and creating the very important Financial transaction tax article! FeydHuxtable (talk) 18:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

I may add some more info and some pics to the article later. If you dont like any of the changes just revert, I wont mind and its quicker than discussion! FeydHuxtable (talk) 18:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Financial Transaction Tax

Boyd -- excellent start on this important topic! A few points it might be good to elaborate further ...

• Keynes was concerned about using the tax not primarily as a revenue generator, but primarily as a way to tamp down bubbles or 'speculative froth'. There are several good examples of the use of the tax in the article, but little reference to the ability of such taxes to actually accomplish this goal. For example, did the Swedish initiative reduce 'speculative froth' or did it simply shrink the whole market without reducing froth?
• Include more detail on the Tobin and Spahn tax proposals -- what precisely they are, and how precisely they are different.
• In the same line, it was a housing bubble that caused the financial meltdown of 2008. There has been much subsequent talk in international fora as well as at the BIS about the need for counter-cyclical monetary and financial regulation. The idea of national financial transactions taxes that increas as bubbles form and grow, and drop or disappear when markets are healthy, has been actively discussed.
• While this is a great article, I think you are really dealing with two distinctly different topics (and two distinct articles) -- national and international financial transaction taxes. The prospects for the former have greatly improved with the meltdown; the challenges with the latter remain as daunting as those for a global climate deal and for similar reasons -- the problem of free-riding nations. Consequently these two topics are subject to very different histories and likely future prospects.Brett epic (talk) 18:05, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Brett. You raised some good points. About your last point: This is a good discussion for all interested Wikipedia editors, so please see this link to carry on this discussion. Thanks.

Boyd Reimer (talk) 19:39, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Volcker Rule

Glad to see you start this page. I offered some ways on the talk page there on how to flesh out the article and began to do a bit of work - tell me what you think. Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:53, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Message to all participants of the March 1, 2010 discussion on Tobin tax article

Greetings all participants of this discussion on the Tobin tax article (click here to see context):

Two heads are always better than one.

There is no rush, and need for emotions to be raised to a high level: I mentioned the G20 summit in June, but that is still over three months away. As I said, I will not rush into anything, and will even go so far as to use my sandbox for you to critique ---that is , if we decide to subdivide this article.

Without wanting to appear as if I am overemphasizing the point, it is consensus which governs Wikipedia. I actively sought this consensus by posting a message in the following Talk pages of the following Users in the following order. The order was chosen in terms of how many edits they have made to the Tobin tax article:

Benwm, CosmicCube, WWWords, last FeydHuxtable (clicking on each of these will show my posts in each of their Talk pages, inviting them to join the discussion on the Tobin tax article (click here to see context))

Please take note that out of the four that I contacted, I was aware that 3 of those 4 have had disagreements with me in the past. Therefore, my seeking them out is evidence that I am not guilty of Meatpuppetry.

Quite frankly I had never even heard of FeydHuxtable until he gave me a barnstar. The Tobin tax article was very disorganized before I first arrived at it December 21, 2009. (See the article before my first post on December 21, 2009 and compare that to the how it looked on January 5 here.... the "then" and "now".) I like to believe that the reason FeydHuxtable gave me a barnstar was at least partly due to the fact that (in my opinion) it became decidedly more organized after I put time into it...all the way till January 5 when I got the barnstar..see the post where I got the barnstar.

The Talk:Tobin tax page is only for improving the Tobin tax article. If any of you want to dialogue with me about any other issues than that, please use this Talk page for that. Thank you.

Also, here is just a gentle reminder that this Wikipedia policy contains this quote about talk pages for articles (eg. the Tobin tax talk page) :

"...bear in mind that talk pages exist for the purpose of discussing how to improve articles; they are not mere general discussion pages ....Wikipedians who wish to hold casual discussions with fellow Wikipedians can use the IRC channels, such as #wikipedia."

Peace

Two heads are always better than one.

Boyd Reimer (talk) 01:05, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

"Robin Hood" Tax

Hello

I see you are interested in financial transaction taxes and have authored numerous articles. I believe the RHT article here is in need of improvement. I would be interested in your feedback and guidance on the edits I will be making in the near future.

Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beganlocal (talk • contribs) 22:40, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions. I will help as my time allows, but unfortunately I cannot guarantee that my time will allow extensive help. If you need to defend your article from unconstructive edits, please familiarize yourself with the "Key Wikipedia policies and guidelines" accessed from the blue box at the top of this page. - Peace, Boyd Reimer (talk) 10:55, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Robin hood tax to Robin Hood tax

Hi. I've left a note on Talk:Robin hood tax regarding the page move. Thanks! -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 11:44, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

thanks

Just a quick note of thanks for the recent deletion alert. i logged in much too late, but thanks anyway. You gave a nice quantitative argument against deletion, even though it should not have been needed.

You might be interested in WP:BIAS. A dramatic example of the systematic demographic bias (and other biases) in the English-language wikipedia is the deletion of the list of Iraqi academics being systematically assassinated. i saw the deletion proposal much too late, the one person against deletion made a syntax error so that keep wasn't in bold, and the mood of most of the people participating was that the president of Baghdad University, the head of the Baghdad Center for Human Rights, and the person who had been president of the Union of Arab Geologists and from 1996 to 2002 had been vice president of the International Union of Geological Sciences, plus several hundred other Iraqi academics, are "otherwise non-notable people who died in a particular event". Compare this to the 4000 or so United States academics who were not subject to a systematic assassination program, but all have individual en.wikipedia entries. Imagine that just a dozen US academics were subject to an assassination program. Would they be entitled to a "list of" entry? Boud (talk) 10:06, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Tiptoety ^talk 05:55, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

David Edward Coombs page

Boyd,

A page was created on me when I started my law practice. I contributed information and a picture to that page. It was recently tagged as needing additional resources, written like a resume, and indicating a conflict of interest. Can you help by either fixing the issues that are noted, or by having an administrator remove the page for me?

The reason that I am contacting you is that you created the Bradley Manning page. As you may know, I have been retained to represent him in his case. I appreciate your assistance.

Best, David —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.182.77 (talk) 19:52, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Greetings "David",

Actually I never did create the Bradley Manning page.

Please [click here] to find out more about the beginnings of the "Bradley Manning / Brad Manning" page.

And click here to go to the talk page of the original creator of the "Brad Manning" page, McCart42. To leave a message with that User, you may click the statement at the top of that user's page (which says "Feel free to leave me a message!")

Unfortunately, I'm a very busy person and can't guarantee the degree to which I will help. Nevertheless, in the coming days, I will try to see how much time I can invest in helping you navigate through the Wikipedia policies and guidelines in your particular situation.

In the meantime, you may want to familiarize yourself with the page on Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Also see "Key Wikipedia Policies and guidelines": See the blue bar at the top of this page; On the right side of the bar click on the word "show."

Sincerely, Boyd Reimer (talk) 00:59, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Superior Orders page

Boyd,

I see you've been active in adding more information on the Jeremy Hinzman case to the Superior Orders page. Not sure you saw my comment on the talk page that the inclusion of Hinzman's case and Ehren Watada's case is inappropriate to the discussion of superior orders (basically, it's apples and oranges). I'd like to hear your response to my concerns. Thanks! Hzoi (talk) 18:10, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

p.s. I'd also like to hear your response to my comments on the Talk:Jeremy Hinzman page re: the broadening of the definition of conscientious objection. Hzoi (talk) 18:20, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Contempt of Parliament

		The Epic Barnstar
		For your substantial work in updating, cleaning up, and generally ensuring the accuracy of the Contempt of Parliament page, and the amount of professionalism with which it appears the article was scribed, I award you this barnstar. light theworld (talk) 01:11, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Survey w PPV question.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Survey w PPV question.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Markus Schulze 19:24, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

I agree it should be deleted. In the future, before I start an article, I'll put it my sandbox and get others to screen it. Sorry for the trouble I have caused anyone.- Sincerely, Boyd Reimer (talk) 09:32, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Boyd Reimer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Boyd Reimer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Boyd Reimer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon Taylor. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

October 2021

Your edit to Energy subsidy has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:46, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for the correction. This was my mistake. Boyd Reimer (talk) 16:14, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your edits at 2023 Canadian wildfires and Wildfire

Hi there, I wanted to provide more explanation as to why I reverted your recent edits.

On Wikipedia, we have a policy (WP:DUE) that says we should provide due weight to various viewpoints. By creating a separate section for a single news story about a fringe belief, we put more attention on the topic than is due. That's why I removed your addition at 2023 Canadian wildfires and replaced it with a single sentence about the arson accusations. I reverted your edit at Wildfire because of WP:DUE concerns as well, but also because it generally did not fit into the scope of the article, which is about the worldwide, general concept of wildfires.

Thanks for your contributions, and let me know if you have any questions or issues. Wracking ^talk! 21:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)