User talk:Bowchicawowwow

Speedy deletion of Thomas Kreinberg

A tag has been placed on Thomas Kreinberg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Myanw 19:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about you make yourself a user page? User:Bowchicawowwow. That may cheer you up ;) delldot talk 19:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aw! Sorry! delldot talk 19:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Monkey dogs

A tag has been placed on Monkey dogs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. CobaltBlueTony 19:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Pompey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Greswik 19:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Being "mean"

It's not about anyone being nice or mean. It's about not adding nonsense to the encyclopedia. Friday (talk) 19:33, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Shock site, you will be blocked from editing. Ryan4314 22:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Winfree

Hey I'm bored in classroom 3. l o l —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.45.130.162 (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]