User talk:Bortak42

Why are you removing facts?

Speedy deletion nomination of Battle of Rabotyne

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Battle of Rabotyne requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BangJan1999 18:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GS alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

As well as a higher expectation in respect to behaviour, non-ECP editors may not edit articles within the scope of the Russo-Ukrainian War - even if the page is not specifically protected. Cinderella157 (talk) 12:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cinderella157 (talk) 00:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 01:39, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard block, not one under the General Sanctions provision above, however, any admin is welcome to modify it if they feel it should be covered. Since this was the editor's first block, I felt this was enough. Please note Bortak42, that the next block for incivility in any Russo-Ukrainian War related article may either be for an indefinite period, or may result in your simply being blocked from editing ANY article on that topic. The threshold for sanctions in Russo-Ukrainian War related articles is very low, and disruptive behavior will not be tolerated. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 01:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Until this editor reaches the WP:XC tenure, they are not permitted to edit any articles or components of which that are covered by the WP:GS/RUSUKR sanction regime — i.e. the Russo-Ukrainian War topic area. Only talk pages, per those Remedies. That needs to be made clear. El_C 04:21, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I had just focused on the personal attacks, but this is correct. Before he can edit anywhere in Russo-Ukrainian topics, they must have 500 edits outside of that area (and outside of other contentious areas) and at least 30 days here at Wikipedia. That is what the template above was explaining, but they didn't take the time to read. If they come back and edit ANY in those areas, they will be blocked again. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 05:33, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is currently happening. SaintPaulOfTarsus (talk) 02:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you come back, feel free to make questions in my talk page. I'll try my best to help. Alexis Coutinho (talk) ^[ping me] 05:26, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ElENdElA. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Khromove—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ElENdElA (talk) 10:20, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This is your final warning. I will report you to WP:ANI if you keep trying to restore the Battle of Vovchansk or any other merged article. Go through the formal WP:SPLITTING procedure. Put a tag on the target article and start a discussion on undoing the merge to achieve consensus. I repeat once again that the target article hasn't met the criteria for splitting. Super Ψ Dro 14:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually. To avoid this situation from repeating again and because I am not here to report people I have started the discussion myself [1]. ~~Though my warning stands.~~ Super Ψ Dro 14:22, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Striking out initial comment, given I did not follow a formal procedure either, and per ANI discussion. Super Ψ Dro 16:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024 (31 May 2024)

Hello, I'm WeatherWriter. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:2024 Kharkiv offensive that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 15:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As a side-note, there is an ongoing discussion about splitting the “Battle of Vovchansk” into a stand-alone article. You can participate in in that discussion here. But please, don’t send messages that are not civil towards others, even if you have received or believe you received an uncivil message from them. It is never a good idea to fight fire with fire. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 15:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023 (31 May 2024, 2)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Super Ψ Dro 15:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]