User talk:Borinquen122617

Welcome!

Hello, Borinquen122617, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:31, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hi Hi Puffy AmiYumi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hi Hi Puffy AmiYumi was changed by Borinquen122617 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867709 on 2018-08-23T12:15:36+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:15, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Borinquen122617, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! — Newslinger talk 00:26, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Naval warfare, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - wolf 21:28, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Institutional Revolutionary Party, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Gumbi93 (talk) 21:44, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Death and state funeral of Fidel Castro, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 00:27, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 15:00, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Borinquen122617, to clarify the above, the disruption they see is that you're removing sourced content without discussing your changes ("it's not true" isn't a useful discussion), and you're making changes without showing what your reliably-sourced basis is for the change. If you start using edit summaries more, make it clear where your information is coming from, and discuss when reverted, you should be good going forward. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:16, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BLP categories

Hello. Regarding your edit to Danielle Bregoli, please review Wikipedia:Categorization/Ethnicity, gender, religion and sexuality. All categories must be supported by reliable sources, and this is especially important for biographies of living people. Ethniccelebs.com does not appear to be a reliable source, and information like this must already be in the article with a reliable source before it is added as a category. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 19:55, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dictatorship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Secretariat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Public Power Corporation. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Matthew_hk t c 20:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hi Hi Puffy AmiYumi, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Please don't remove "citation needed" templates without actually adding a citation, to a reliable source, to the article itself; a citation to Wikia in an edit summary does not work. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:44, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Presidency of Gerald Ford, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:46, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Glioblastoma. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. What was the basis for this change? It appears to have been made effectively at random. That's not okay. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:47, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. You have continued to make poor changes without sources after all the warnings above. Adding that the Russian revolution in 1917 was consciously modelled on the Iranian Revolution of 1979[1] is simply nonsense, for instance. (Yes, you linked the claim to the article about the Iranian Revolution of 1979.) You have ignored all warnings and simply steamed ahead. I'm sorry, because you probably mean well, but you have become a net negative to the encyclopedia, and are keeping other people busy cleaning up after you. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 19:53, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]