User talk:BorchePetkovski

April 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Macedonians (Greeks). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dr. K. 00:48, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Macedonia (Greece). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Dr. K. 00:54, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jingiby. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 07:19, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 08:03, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BorchePetkovski, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi BorchePetkovski! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019

Please refrain from changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 15:25, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Jingiby (talk) 03:26, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

If you change the infobox header at 2019 North Macedonian presidential election again, you're going to be blocked. Please stop. Number 5 7 21:26, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with the title

Change the title! North Macedonian does not exist, only Macedonian... BorchePetkovski (talk) 22:18, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Stevo Pendarovski the president of the Republic of North Macedonia.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Stevo Pendarovski the president of the Republic of North Macedonia.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. funplussmart (talk) 23:40, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 North Macedonian presidential election. – Teratix ₵ 23:42, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Jingiby (talk) 04:18, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:22, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify: the above is a standardized notification that's required to make you aware of the possibility of special sanctions. The sentence "It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions" is part of this standard template and as such obligatory. That doesn't mean I'm saying your contributions have been okay. Indeed, your recent edits on Vardar, Europe, Macedonian language and others have been quite disruptive, and if you continue like that you will be reported and most likely topic-banned. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:28, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is BorchePetkovski. Thank you. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:42, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sanction

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

You have been topic banned from all areas pertaining to Macedonia, broadly construed.

You have been sanctioned for overall disruptive behaviour. There was clear consensus among uninvolved admins to apply sanctions. Please refer to this arbitration enforcement request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. El_C 20:43, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Be aware that all your edits since the topic ban was imposed have been in violation as they relate to "Macedonia, broadly construed". Specifically at Eastern Orthodoxy in Europe you edit content relating to the Macedonian Orthodox Church, Kiril Lazarov is a Macedonian person and RK Vardar is a Macedonian team. These are all clearly related to Macedonia. I'm not going to issue any sanction or take you to AE over these edits as they are not in and of themselves obviously disruptive, however I (and almost certainly other editors) will not take that view in the future and you will likely be blocked. You need to stay clear of the topic covered by your ban. Thryduulf (talk) 21:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Thryduulf: I was randomly checking up on this user just 'cause. It saddens me to report to you about this edit. I really would have preferred this user just listen to the many warnings on their talk page instead of this.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 05:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is BorchePetkovski. Thank you. —Thryduulf (talk) 09:51, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per the result of the discussion at AE, you have been indefinitely blocked as a normal admin action. See the block notice below. EdJohnston (talk) 16:12, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indef

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing and failure to obey your topic ban from Macedonia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

See the complaint about your edits at WP:AE. This is not an AE block, and I give permission for any admin to undo the block if they become convinced that you will follow policy in the future and will also obey your topic ban from Macedonia. EdJohnston (talk) 16:16, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]