User talk:Bop2k3

January 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Lucifer (film), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Do not add non-theatrical revenue under gross. Ab207 (talk) 17:47, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Madhura Raja. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:45, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Mamangam (2019 film), you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 16:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Hridayam. - Arjayay (talk) 16:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 03:09, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pranav Mohanlal.
You have just served a block for unsourced edits, but started again as soon as it finished, please stop - Arjayay (talk) 18:51, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Pranav Mohanlal. - Arjayay (talk) 13:04, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dileep. - Arjayay (talk) 20:52, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rajeev Parameshwar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 20:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Balram vs. Tharadas. - Arjayay (talk) 19:43, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Balram vs. Tharadas. - Arjayay (talk) 19:43, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly an ongoing issue despite a wall of warnings. If it continues once the current block expires, your next one is likely to be indefinite. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:05, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Madhura Raja. - Arjayay (talk) 12:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mamangam (2019 film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 12:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaappa Kurishu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chase. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Oz\^InterAct 12:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hanumanthu (film)

Hello, Bop2k3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hanumanthu (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]