User talk:Bookseum

Welcome to wikipedia! Bitofdust (talk) 19:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bookseum/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 00:00, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bookseum, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 (talk) 00:00, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work!

		The WikiCookie
		You've learned how to use basic wikicode in your sandbox. You can always return there to experiment more.

Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Bookseum (talk) 06:49, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WOW!!! I want a wikicookie!!!!! that is sooo cool!Cmisc (talk) 18:55, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HI! Thanks for your edit of this page. Cmisc (talk) 18:21, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Amy Lockhart concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Amy Lockhart, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi HasteurBot. Thank you for your concern. I do plan on improving the article. Bookseum (talk) 21:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Hi bookseum!

Cmisc (talk) 00:26, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Great presentation! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmisc (talk • contribs) 18:56, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, how is the edit a thon going? 138.202.1.215 (talk) 20:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fact: You have all the best cats Marenjs (talk) 20:21, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amy Lockhart

Hello, Bookseum. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Amy Lockhart".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cherushii (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying our simplest standards and notability cannot be inherited from others.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cherushii and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 00:48, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cherushii has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cherushii. Thanks! TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:37, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheSandDoctor thank you for your comment. Does this mean my AfC is still in re-review by the original reviewer? I'm not clear on how the review process works. Bookseum (talk) 17:23, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome and thank you for tagging me otherwise I would most likely never have seen this. It is still awaiting review, I just commented on the draft. There are a few stages/states: awaiting review, under review (may or may not be used), declined, accepted. Awaiting review means it may be reviewed at any time, under review is an optional one for reviewers and when it is up on a draft please avoid editing the page as it is currently under review and may cause edit conflicts (as in they edit, then server rejects yours or visa versa depending who clicks 'save' first). Declined means it is no longer under review and will have a new template placed that will explain the reasoning and possibly have a comment from the reviewer (as reasons are typically generic templates). Accepted means that the draft submitted has been submitted and is now an article. If you have any more questions please feel free to ask me (and be sure to tag me as well!) or check the teahouse. For more information on AFC or to ask reviewers a question you can do so here. Hope this helps! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:33, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This does help! Thank you TheSandDoctor. The wait continues...Bookseum (talk) 18:09, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are more than welcome and thank you for tagging me once again :D Sadly AFC is backlogged with over 600 awaiting review. I have heard that the wait time could be a couple of weeks (or less, most reviewers hit 'Find random submission' button so is random as to when one is reviewed). If you have any more questions feel free to let me know. If it isn't reviewed in a couple of weeks I may be able to expedite the process (but no guarantees). --TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:14, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cherushii has been accepted

Cherushii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

ProgrammingGeek^talktome 16:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red's April+Further with Art+Feminism 2018

		Please join us as Women in Red and Art+Feminism continue our collaboration in April 2018. Continue the work you've done in March and pledge to help close the gender gap in April! All you need to do is sign up on the Meet-Up page below and list any articles you create in the month of April. April+Further with Art+Feminism
		To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: `@wikiwomeninred`

August and New Achievements at Women in Red

Meetups #87, #88, #89, #90

An exciting new month for Women in Red!

August 2018 worldwide online editathons:
New: Indigenous women Women of marginalized populations Women writers Geofocus: Bottom 10
Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
Notable women, broadly-construed!

For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative

All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards.
It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August.
Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

Call for members for the Gender Diversity Visibility Community User Group

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Women in Red April Events

April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117

Hello and welcome to the April events of Women in Red!

Please join us for these virtual events:

New topics: Gender studies / United Nations / Dance
Geofocus: Portuguese-speakers
Continuing initiatives: Suffrage / #1day1woman

Other ways you can participate:

Help us plan our future events: Ideas Cafe
Join the conversations on our talkpage
Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred

Subscription options: Opt-in (EN-WP) / Opt-in (international) / Unsubscribe

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chulita Vinyl Club

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chulita Vinyl Club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 00:55, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Thanks for creating Chulita Vinyl Club.

User:Rosguill while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

I think that this meets WP:GNG, but it needs significant copyediting for tone and neutrality.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:02, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cherushii for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cherushii is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cherushii until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Aasim (talk) 06:59, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]