Jump to content

User talk:Bonewah/archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 March 2015

[edit]

WikiProject Ships

[edit]

Hi, when you have a free moment would you have a look at this discussion at the WikiProject Ships talk page? Thanks - theWOLFchild 13:46, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 March 2015

[edit]

.

The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015

[edit]

The Signpost, 1 April 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 01 April 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 April 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 April 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 April 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 06 May 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 27 May 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 03 June 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 24 June 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

[edit]

I genuinely appreciate the courtesy and effort of informing me of your {{prod}} for the Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy documents, and offering the opportunity to engage about the topic.

Thank you.

This article was created to relieve the burden on the footnotes and links for the various articles in the system of articles of the Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy, and is decidedly not a link farm, as the {{prod}} template accuses. I invite you to leave the article standing as a part of that system of articles that attempt to collectively describe the activity and history of the event, with references to source material.

I invite you to consider it a list, a variety of recognized wikipedia article categories.

If you insist that the Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy documents should go away, then I will then accordingly integrate the contents into each and all of the various Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy articles so the interested reader may follow up on the cited and related documents, or alternatively, via some similar comprehensive resources and citations article, so the reader may ultimately be able to locate the various sources cited and reviewed and publicized in Congress and other locations.

Regards,
Yellowdesk (talk) 23:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

[edit]

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

[edit]

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

[edit]

disruptive canvassing

[edit]

[1], per [2]. Don't do that.

"Vote-stacking: Posting messages to users selected based on their known opinions (which may be made known by a userbox, user category, or prior statement).[2] Vote-banking involves recruiting editors perceived as having a common viewpoint for a group, similar to a political party, in the expectation that notifying the group of any discussion related to that viewpoint will result in a numerical advantage, much as a form of prearranged vote stacking."

One more stunt like that and I will report you.Volunteer Marek (talk) 23:32, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

[edit]

edit warring

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Arthur Laffer. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

What makes it worse is that you know you're edit warring and appear to be excited about it [3]. I suggest you self revert and try to achieve consensus on talk (via holding an RfC if you'd like).Volunteer Marek (talk) 23:59, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

[edit]