User talk:Boneticore 1081

Welcome!

Hello, Boneticore 1081, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 22:06, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm 93. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Portal:Current events/2019 April 16 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. 9³ (talk) 23:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Portal:Current events/2019 April 16, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 9³ (talk) 02:36, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 100,000. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Alternatively, you can use the Preview button to produce a page with your edits applied without adding to the page's history. 9³ (talk) 23:46, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 20,150,122 (number) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 20,150,122 (number) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20,150,122 (number) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 07:10, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please do not add content or create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. SSSB (talk) 07:11, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 10:55, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I leave it to another administrator to decide whether the user is here to write an encyclopedia.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:30, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ymblanter, Might as well indef them right now Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 02:11, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. CataracticPlanets (talk) 01:55, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ammo Master

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ammo Master, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 02:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Boneticore! Tell me what you're doing or I will block you indefinitely. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 02:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I noticed that hours after I was blocked, my edits to Mitchell Johnson and Andrew Golden were hidden. As far as I can tell, the edits did not contain anything harmful, other than an entire unsourced section, but I did not use any attacking words in those edits. Can you please tell me why my edits were in violation of the BLP policy? I understand that it is wrong to add unsourced information, but the content I added in this edit did not contain personal attacks, to the best of my memory. Boneticore 1081 (talk) 12:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, the edits did not contain anything harmful other than an entire unsourced section <-- you answered your own question. @Materialscientist and Drmies: may wanna reconsider TPA now... Praxidicae (talk) 13:18, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thing is, Boneticore, Wikipedia isn't really a place where you can drop Christian apologies for mass murderers. Drmies (talk) 17:02, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]