User talk:Bodhi Peace

Archives

September 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guy (Help!) 07:59, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are two reasons for this block.

You are subject to an editing restriction [1], but your contributions show that you have consistently violated it.
This ANI thread showing persistent addition of advertorial into articles.

Any unblock will be conditional on the editing restriction being respected and a topic ban from food, nutrition and health, broadly construed. Guy (Help!) 08:04, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sweetener

Hello, Bodhi Peace. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Sweetener, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 00:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sweetener

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sweetener requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copy and paste from Sugar substitute; banned user

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 03:16, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bodhi Peace (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a direct appeal for clemency for the block I received a while back. The block says that "Any unblock will be conditional on the editing restriction being respected and a topic ban from food, nutrition and health, broadly construed." I agree to honoring the editing restriction regarding REDIRECTS and also not editing the "Nutrition" and/or "Health" section of food related articles nor editing articles specifically on a topic covering Food Nutrition and Healthy Food. My interests have diversified and so I will appeal that topic ban at a later time if I feel able to constructively contribute to those articles. Then, I will only edit unrelated topics until that time. Bod (talk) 21:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your unblock request was rejected by the community; see Special:Diff/889330456. You may wish to take the feedback from this discussion into account if you make another unblock request later. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:43, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have copied your request to WP:AN; as the block was imposed as the result of a community discussion, it cannot be undone unilaterally. We'll see what the community say. GoldenRing (talk) 17:16, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If I unblock you for the purpose of participating at AN, will you agree to edit nowhere except that section at AN and your own talkpage? GoldenRing (talk) 13:26, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~I think he is surreptitiously adding marketing comments in at least one article. Please check Beyond Meat. scope_creep^Talk 10:43, 9 May 2019 (UTC)~~ scope_creep^Talk 10:46, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fruits originating in Arabia

A tag has been placed on Category:Fruits originating in Arabia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Work work work work work" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Work work work work work. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 28#Work work work work work until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 13:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Bum bum be-dum" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Bum bum be-dum. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 31#Bum bum be-dum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pamzeis (talk) 13:54, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tom Brier

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tom Brier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at WIkipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Brier. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --- Possibly (talk) 02:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Junk food vegan" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Junk food vegan and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 20#Junk food vegan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 21:32, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Skux" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Skux has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 25 § Skux until a consensus is reached. Merko (talk) 03:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sarah & Duck.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sarah & Duck.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]