User talk:Bnlawrance

Welcome!

Hello, Bnlawrance, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Benjamin Lawrance, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 18:41, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Benjamin Lawrance

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Benjamin Lawrance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 18:41, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, Bnlawrance. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. 99.136.252.89 (talk) 18:43, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding copyright violations, WP:PARAPHRASE is relevant, as well. 99.136.252.89 (talk) 18:55, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Bnlawrance. You have new messages at Talk:Benjamin Lawrance.
Message added 20:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Darkwind (talk) 20:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bnlawrance, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Bnlawrance! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Hajatvrc (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:21, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...kind of more of same

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 99.136.252.89 (talk) 20:46, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the templates are valid. Please don't delete them again. You are editing the article on you, which is strongly discouraged, especially if, as it seems, you are not editing in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines on neutrality. An encyclopedic article should not look like a resume. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 21:14, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dear Bnlawrance, this can't go on. You keep re-adding content that at least three editors (two of them administrators) have removed. You have not responded to any of the messages on your talk page or on the article's talk page, and you aren't giving edit summaries explaining what you're doing and why. Moreover, it is appears like you are really interested in Wikipedia only to post your resume. That cannot be. If you return to this article, and if you again make the kind of edits that has been reverted again and again, I will have no choice but to block you. Sorry, but that's the way it is; I hope it doesn't get that far. Drmies (talk) 23:38, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies, I apologize. I didn't realize I'd returned material that was removed. I did respond to specific requests, deleting the Rotary reference, and some fellowships, and other material. I won't touch it further. (Bnlawrance (talk) 14:59, 19 January 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Dear Bnlawrance, we're not out to get you or to delete your article. We are interested, of course, in a decent article on a notable person. We can't automatically forbid you from editing it, nor do we want to, but if you do edit an article which which you have a conflict of interest, you need to be double sure that such edits are neutral and well-verified, and that they agree with guidelines in WP:BLP, our policy for biographies of living persons. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 18:36, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]