Jump to content

Talk:Benjamin Lawrance

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because I maintain copyright to information the original site, which is about me, and composed by myself.

I have made several substantive changes, but as the details are factual, and short phrases, there is going to be repetition.

None of which responds to additional issues, common to writing an autobiography on Wikipedia, including those of neutrality WP:NPOV, WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY and WP:OWNERSHIP. As well, WP:PARAPHRASE refers to the slight modification of copied text. 99.136.252.89 (talk) 18:59, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will try to address neutrality, and do my best with the other issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bnlawrance (talk • contribs) 19:08, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think I had deleted anything that appears too biased. Although I appreciate this is indeed autobiographical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bnlawrance (talk • contribs) 19:11, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is written with no snarkiness intended: In its current state the article is patently unacceptable. Any article which takes a biography from a school's website as a template is bound to read as promotional in tone; such entries are, essentially, public relations pieces, and, as in this instance, tend to look a lot like a resume, per WP:RESUME. In terms of formatting, all external links ought to be jettisoned in favor of inline citations, connected to a reference list, much as one uses in a scholarly essay. Finally, all of this would be far better if you allowed someone else to write about you, removing the human tendency toward vanity. 99.136.252.89 (talk) 19:13, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I did not read your message as snarky. I have tried to follow your citation style suggestions and other ideas. I have also addressed the copyright issues by adding a creative commons notice to the site, and emailing an email correspondence to wikimedia about the permission granted. ( Bnlawrance (talk) 14:36, 18 January 2013 (UTC) )[reply]

I think the most recent cites added under 'Works' are helpful in establishing significance in your field. I've asked for help from an administrator to otherwise clean up and 'depuff' the article. 99.136.252.89 (talk) 21:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Otherwise, you're way too involved in this, and another editor has expressed the intent to bring this up at the conflict of interest noticeboard, which I'll support. 99.136.252.89 (talk) 21:22, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Benjamin Lawrance, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.rit.edu/cla/sociology/international/conable.html. As a copyright violation, Benjamin Lawrance appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Benjamin Lawrance has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Benjamin Lawrance and send an email with the message to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Benjamin Lawrance with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Benjamin Lawrance.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Bnlawrance (talk) 18:57, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the website to list permission under creative commons. http://www.rit.edu/cla/sociology/international/conable.html ( Bnlawrance (talk) 14:36, 18 January 2013 (UTC) ) This material no longer constitutes a copyright violation. I have also emailed permissions-en@wikimedia.org ( Bnlawrance (talk) 14:36, 18 January 2013 (UTC) )[reply]

Donating copyrighted text

[edit]

Hi there, I'm Darkwind, an administrator here at Wikipedia. This article was flagged as a copyright violation, which normally means we would delete it immediately. However, since you state that you own the copyright to the text that you are paraphrasing, please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions on how to release or license that text for use on Wikipedia (and elsewhere). Please note that this should be done within 7 days or the article may be deleted anyway (assuming the paraphrasing is still too close to the original). —Darkwind (talk) 20:09, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I have updated the website, to include reuse under creative commons license. http://www.rit.edu/cla/sociology/international/conable.html This material no longer constitutes a copyright violation. I have also emailed permissions-en@wikimedia.org. ( Bnlawrance (talk) 14:35, 18 January 2013 (UTC) )[reply]

I've tagged this again, for the reasons that commonly attend autobiographies here. There are numerous honors that don't merit listing in an encyclopedia (scholarships, Rotary Club membership), lists of publications without references supporting their individual noteworthiness, and very few references that actually refer to the subject. The lineage of the family name is irrelevant. There doesn't appear to be a single article about the subject; the notability of Barber Conabel is more substantially sourced here than that of Professor Lawrance. 99.136.252.89 (talk) 18:24, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Benjamin Lawrance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:37, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Benjamin_Lawrance&oldid=1201871076"