User talk:Bml2424

January 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to National Policy Institute has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: National Policy Institute was changed by Bml2424 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954012 on 2016-01-04T23:26:01+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Joaquim Barbosa. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Joaquim Barbosa was changed by Bml2424 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.899388 on 2016-01-04T23:29:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Joaquim Barbosa

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Dcirovic (talk) 23:32, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Carl Barât

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Carl Barât article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:28, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Julius Henry Rawthbourne III"

Julius Henry Rawthbourne III, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it has no content\, other than external links\, categories\, "see also" sections\, rephrasing of the title\, and/or chat-like comments.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:04, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Julius Henry Rawthbourne III

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Julius Henry Rawthbourne III, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Donner60 (talk) 03:16, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Kings High School (Kings Mills, Ohio)

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Kings High School (Kings Mills, Ohio) article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! Melonkelon (talk) 23:57, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sycamore High School (Cincinnati, Ohio) ‎. Meters (talk) 00:07, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bml2424 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry! I won't vandalize Wikipedia anymore! I was stupid. Please unblock me. Bml2424 (talk) 01:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Bml2424[reply]

Decline reason:

Given your past contributions and the many warnings you ignored, I see no reason to believe that unblocking you would improve the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 01:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bml2424 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please please please please please unblock me i wanna be unblocked i wont do anything bad i promise!Bml2424 (talk) 15:21, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Bml2424[reply]

Decline reason:

You were warned; you ignored the warnings; you got blocked. What did you expect? I see no evidence that allowing you to edit here would be a positive move. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bml2424 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will change my ways and will not vandalize anymore. Bml2424 (talk) 19:26, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Bml2424[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.