User talk:Blythwood/2016/May

Archives

Your GA nomination of Gill Sans

The article Gill Sans you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gill Sans for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 04:01, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Weird Twitter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Weird Twitter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weird Twitter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Laber□^T 21:26, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Gill Sans at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 09:18, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Bembo

The article Bembo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bembo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sainsf -- Sainsf (talk) 03:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request

You Deleted my created article Dewey McKinley Wilton but it is true : http://www.wilton.com/cms-wilton-history.html This is one of top confectionary site and baking site. Pls reply me at my talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rendell1234 (talk • contribs) 07:22, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AIV and Flysomething Capital Partners

Hi - I'll leave your AIV reports up for a bit as there are other admins who patrol AIV that should probably have a look, but regardless I suggest you nominate all the BLPs for AFD in one nomination. You could do them individually but one nom is easier since they're related. They don't pass GNG imo, and I think this is the way to go rather than blocking. You could also start an SPI with the two named accounts, but I'd hold on that until the AFD is complete to see if they try to recreate the pages. Of course, it's entirely up to you. :-) Katie^talk 16:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why information on well-known investors is "promotional"

I am a business student and I study investing/startups. I created a page for 2 of the most well-known investors in Boston and NYC. Not to promote them, to share who they are and what they have done that has contributed to technology today. Why did you delete them? What is the purpose of that? Now people who search these individuals every day to read about their experience and learn from their careers are left without proper biographies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidLorentz (talk • contribs) 16:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DavidLorentz: - David, I hope you'll understand that it seems to me a heck of a coincidence that all your edits are on the topic of this Flybridge company. And that you carried off exactly where NickShanman left off yesterday. And that, like Mr. Shanman, you uploaded two corporate headshots as your "own work". I did recommend that you disclose any connections to this company or other accounts for editing Wikipedia before you made any more of a fool of yourself. I think some truthfulness is in order. Blythwood (talk) 20:14, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Political colour may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

States)|Republican Party]], despite the fact that the Republican Party is a conservative party. (See [[Red states and blue states]]. The use is probably entrenched, as many political organisations
[[Red states and blue states]]. The use is probably entrenched, as many political organisations (for example the website [[RedState]] now use the term.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Gill Sans

Hello! Your submission of Gill Sans at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:52, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]