User talk:Blunk

Regarding edits to W.I.T.C.H. (TV series)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Blunk! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule petitiononline\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 17:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template Help

Hello Blunk, i know that you hav an interest in W.I.T.C.H. and i dont know how else to contact you

i have made this template and i was wondering if you could look over and add somethings, such as extra people to it, and also add it to some pages which you see and havnt seen it at the bottom of thanku

The template is at Template:W.I.T.C.H.

if this isnt the right place to put things like this i apologise

Why

Why did you undo all my W.I.T.C.H. character page contributions? I know that they need fixing still but why did you do it? Tyar 16:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am 100% aware that my work needs ton of fixing and that is what I was going to do anyway for the most part. I just think undoing all my edits I kind of makes the page useless, and what I was doing was supervised by a vandalist prowler T-borg. Right now, I am going to undo all your corrections and correct them in my style because no offense, but I feel the character page is lacking currently. Thanks for trying to make Wikipedia better, Blunk. Tyar 12:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Meridian

It sounds perfectly reasonable to merge the two articles, so yeah, I'm all for it. In fact, I believe it was a policy, that one should search if the article they intent on starting already exists under an alternate name, but everyone makes mistakes, so it's no biggie. I am interested in this "two Meridians in one" article version, though, and will be looking forward to reading it. On a side note, what do you think about starting a glossary page for W.I.T.C.H., if there is enough to work with, I've noticed they've taken this approach with Neon Genesis Evangelion glossary, and it should clear up some issues on the main page as well. We could also contact some of the main contributors to the W.I.T.C.H. page, see if they can help with something. I mean, it's only natural to combine efforts with them, it is in general the same subject. Hope I've answered your question, drop me another line if I've left something out, and I'll be waiting to see your version. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 15:19, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that I didn't realize the second Meridian page existed. I'm all for merging them then. Tyar 15:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm not gonna lie, this does have some issues, concidering this, and is gonna need some cleanup, but hey, you still did a great job with it. I know I wouldn't do as good in a hundred years, so don't worry, the effort wasn't wasted. Now on to the glossary. Well, "The Hearts", "Special Items", and "Planets" sections content could be moved to that article, the Heart of Kandrakar getting a mention also, with a link to its main article, some frequently visited locations, like the Infinite City, the Fortress of Infinity, places the Guardians frequently visit, Mount Thanos, also. This is gonna be tough, trying to make something encyclopedic and not a crufty list, which could get deleted in two days. That's why I wanted to see how the guys at the W.I.T.C.H. page felt about this, maybe we bring this up at the talk page. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 16:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be only natural to redirect it. As for the glossary, if we manage to find independant third party references for it, it would be more than perfect, any ideas? —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 14:35, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, I ment secondary sources, so that it wouldn't get deleted as original research. —May the Edit be with you, always. (T|C) 16:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]