User talk:Bluenosescholar

November 2017

It appears that you're editing many articles primarily to add references from one author (even when you haven't added any new information). Please stop, particularly if you have a connection with that author. Thanks! ElKevbo (talk) 20:22, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. You can see from my history that I am a newcomer to Wikipedia. (I have had an account for a while, but have not been brave enough to do much editing before this.) I see there is a page offering guidance about not [biting the newcomers]. I will take your comment under advisement. Please appreciate that I am learning as I go.

September 2020

I see you've been cautioned about this before. At Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, it does not take four external references to support one short sentence. Please stop. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Magnolia677 - The references added to Scholarship of Teaching and Learning show how the field is developing. The four external references are to different sources, written by different authors from different institutions. The references show how the thinking behind the 4M framework has developed, who developed it, and how it has evolved, so the four references to support this emerging development in the field are, in fact, necessary. I do not receive any compensation (financial or otherwise) to contribute to wikipedia.Bluenosescholar (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 22:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you:@John B123: for moving this page to a draft format. This is the first time I am attempting to create a new page. I appreciate the opportunity to keep working on it in draft format. I also appreciate your professional and helpful approach. I have updated the draft and submitted it for review.Bluenosescholar (talk) 01:12, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education

Hello, Bluenosescholar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:11, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Bluenosescholar! Your additions to European Network for Academic Integrity have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:43, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

European Network for Academic Integrity moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to European Network for Academic Integrity. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and and the sources present in the article do not show evidence of WP:SIGCOV to pass WP:NORG. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:42, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: European Network for Academic Integrity (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:European Network for Academic Integrity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 15:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bluenosescholar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! C F A 💬 15:28, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]