User talk:Blue windy muso

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
165	University of Burdwan (talk)	Add sources
4	The Life and Religion of Mohammed (talk)	Add sources
9	International Federation of Cheerleading (talk)	Add sources
59	Indian Institute of Information Technology Tiruchirappalli (talk)	Add sources
14	Muhammad: A Prophet for Our Time (talk)	Add sources
355	Battle of Khaybar (talk)	Add sources
162	Bilal: A New Breed of Hero (talk)	Cleanup
17	Analog passthrough (talk)	Cleanup
9	WCSN-LD (talk)	Cleanup
211	South African Communist Party (talk)	Expand
27	Harrison High School (Michigan) (talk)	Expand
64	Kartavyam (talk)	Expand
20	Theni Medical College (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
7	Opinions on the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
11	Ahmad Abu Laban (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
18	WZBJ (talk)	Merge
10	WZBJ-CD (talk)	Merge
45	Central Council of Homeopathy (talk)	Merge
91	Criticism of Hadith (talk)	Wikify
1,161	Dieter Rams (talk)	Wikify
26	Muhammad ibn Maslamah (talk)	Wikify
16	National Institute of Technology, Okinawa College (talk)	Orphan
10	Onyx E-cell (talk)	Orphan
24	Govindpur, Bihar (talk)	Orphan
58	Aalaporaan Thamizhan (talk)	Stub
23	Kante Koothurne Kanu (talk)	Stub
22	Muhammad: A Biography of the Prophet (talk)	Stub
8	Venkatachalapuram (talk)	Stub
31	Gary Hustwit (talk)	Stub
36	Repati Pourulu (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:21, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blue windy muso, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Blue windy muso! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:12, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Blue windy muso! You created a thread called Blues and Jazz at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:CAC 21 Sep 13TBONES-1.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:CAC 21 Sep 13TBONES-1.pdf. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Peter Golding MoMo flyer.tif

Thanks for uploading File:Peter Golding MoMo flyer.tif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:31, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Peter Golding's ACE shop front.tif

Thanks for uploading File:Peter Golding's ACE shop front.tif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:03 PG Chelsea Arts Club-1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:03 PG Chelsea Arts Club-1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:100 Club Party.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:100 Club Party.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Rock Graphics 2048x2048.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rock Graphics 2048x2048.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:24, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Origional Stretch Jeans.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Origional Stretch Jeans.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:29, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cafe Django DoverStArts.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cafe Django DoverStArts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cafe django pizza on park.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cafe django pizza on park.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:05 PG TBones-1.jpeg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:05 PG TBones-1.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:05 PG TBones-1.jpeg

Thank you for uploading File:05 PG TBones-1.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

File:Stretching the Blues.jpeg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:05 PG TBones-1.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:05 PG TBones-1.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Jeans Explosion.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Jeans Explosion.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:25, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello Blue windy muso. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Blue windy muso. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Blue windy muso|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:17, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brian Hodges (November 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brian Hodges and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brian Hodges, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 11:05, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:36, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock my master account please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blue windy muso (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok Sherlock I mean Yunshui. You got me. I commend your fastidious detective work. I am a sock-puppet account of User:Anupam. I hoped that pretending to be a drug-addled visual editor user would be the perfect cover, and for a while there I got away with it. I created this account because Kristian Aadnevik and Peter Golding did not want to go down the disclosed COI route, they want to control everything that is said about them on the internet and I believe people and companies should have the right to manage their online reputations, and one's epistemic rights are more important than this encyclopaedia. I suppose you're wondering why a dedicated veteran editor of 15 years would turn to the dark side? Well, it's simple, Wikipedia's paid editing policy is farcical and provides fertile ground for corruption. I would have been happy to continue playing by the rules, but why should I? Since WP introduced the new guidelines for paid editors, User:ThatMontrealIP, User:Yunshui, User:Bbb23, User:DGG, User:GSS and User:MER-C have colluded and established a protection racket. This racket trolls Upwork shaking down small-time paid editors (some disclosed, some not) while taking payments from big business tom preserve the interests of capitalism and protect the status quo. I believe the only way to nip this problem in the bud is to ban all off-wiki communication between admins and editors. No more IRC, no more Wikimania. These places are breeding grounds for corruption. Discussions about paid-editing cases and their outcomes should take place on-wiki, in full view, so that they are transparent. They should not happen on IRC, or WhatsApp or Google Hangouts or seedy lap-dancing clubs on the periphery of Wikimania. You should also ban off-wiki policing as it is a gross invasion of privacy and merely augments this chaos. To summarize, please unblock my master account User:Anupam. If you don't unblock my master account I am going to go to every newspaper and every tech publication and tell them all about Wikipedia's corrupt paid editing police, thus destroying Wikipedia's credibility FOREVER. Blue windy muso (talk) 12:17, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are free to advocate for changes in Wikipedia policy once unblocked. You have an open request on your master account, so it will be addressed there, but threats will not help you get unblocked. 331dot (talk) 12:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blue windy muso (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Will this help get me unblocked? Blue windy muso (talk) 12:29, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Nope. Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 13:03, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Will this help get me unblocked?

Deletion discussion about Physical intelligence

Hello, Blue windy muso

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username North8000 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Physical intelligence, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Physical intelligence.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]