Jump to content

Talk:WZBJ

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:WDRL UPN24.jpg

[edit]

Image:WDRL UPN24.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WDRL-TV ---PLEASE CORRECT Your Wikipedia Listing (Second Request)

[edit]

Please Correct Your Web Site for WDRL-TV

Pending sale of WDRL-TV to Living Faith TV expired of August 7, 2009.

All FCC records have been reflected by this expiration date.

There are NO PLANS by either party MNE Broadcasting, LLC or Living Faith TV to renegotiate this sale or go forward.

On September 9, 2009 WDRL-TV changed hands from MNE Broadcasting, LLC of Virgina to MNE Broadcasting, LLC of Florida with new stockholders. MNE Broadcasting, LLC of Florida is based in Sarasota, FL.

Since the new ownership of MNE Broadcasting, LLC of Florida the station has gone in a different direction in its programming to more syndicated and local.

Mel Eleazer - Senior Management Member MNE Broadcasting, LLC WDRL-TV (941) 961-0165 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Meleazer (talkcontribs) 05:07, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see you have edited that page (WDRL-TV), but your edits have been reverted as vandalism. You removed information along with the references that back up that information, so I can see why someone thought it was vandalism. If you have better, or updated, references to reliable sources to back up the changes you want to make, then please add them. Also, it helps to use edit summaries to explain the changes you make so that people don't think you are just vandalising. --BelovedFreak 11:13, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
In cases of direct conflict of interest it can help to describe any desired changes on the talk page first and mention your conflict of interest, and then only do the absolute minimum necessary on the article page for factual accuracy. Deleting things and tidying things up only leads to problems in such cases. Dmcq (talk) 11:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Call letters changed and now affiliated with Cozi TV

[edit]

WTLU's calls have been changed to WFFP, and is now affiliating with Cozi TV.72.148.3.214 (talk) 06:56, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

[edit]

Can we merge WZBJ-CD with WZBJ? Except for carriage of subchannels on the CD, it's essentially a Lynchburg repeater to WZBJ. Also, WZBJ-CD's page lacks significant history, other than callsign changes (which is also listed in the infobox) and station sale (which was concurrent with parent WZBJ, since both were owned by Liberty University).

This request would be similar to merging KBVO-CD with KBVO. Csworldwide1 (talk) 09:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Its better if we keep WZBJ-CD as a separate article and not be merged/redirected to WZBJ. CentralTime301 (talk, contribs) 13:42, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The difference in sub-channels is reason enough for me that the articles should remain separate. Mlaffs (talk) 04:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing, given the consensus not to merge. Klbrain (talk) 11:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]