User talk:Blue2020

This is Blue2020's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sovereign Bank Arena, New Jersey 2005 (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NALBUMS, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. The artist’s website and music download websites are not acceptable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sovereign Bank Arena, New Jersey 2005 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sovereign Bank Arena, New Jersey 2005, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:42, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Blue2020! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 03:42, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019 Comment Reply

In accordance with WP:NALBUM, an album requires its own notability, and that notability is not inherited and requires independent evidence. That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article. Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting.

In order to establish notability the article needs to satisfy the general notability guidelines - which requires significant coveraqe in multiple independent secondary sources. As I indicated Bruce Springsteen's website is a primary source and therefore not acceptable. The Rolling Stone article doesn't even mention the album at all. If you are able to provide acceptable independent references specifically related to the actual album I'd be happy to review my position. Dan arndt (talk) 04:57, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello, I'm ZimZalaBim. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kenny Loggins have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. ZimZalaBim ^talk 02:07, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sara Bareilles. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:16, 3 July 2019 (UTC) I AM NOT BEING DISRUPTIVE.[reply]

Submitted Sara Bareilles Little Voice Tour info. Would REALLY like it approved.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Gordon Lightfoot. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. David J Johnson (talk) 10:03, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of PantherMan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

Graham87 02:41, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blue2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have done absolutely NOTHING abusive. I did NOT create this account to have it blocked from editing. I JUST, WITHIN THE LAST FEW MONTHS CREATED THIS ACCOUNT. GIVE ME ANOTHER CHANCE. I've created several in the last few years - I Can't keep ANY, they've ALL been blocked Blue2020 (talk) 02:32, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Oh, you're a block evading abuser of multiple accounts, then? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 02:36, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blue2020It was created as a replacement NOT a sock puppet. It was created because you shut PantherMan off too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blue2020 (talk • contribs) 03:12, 29 July 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Blue2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27231 was submitted on Oct 21, 2019 03:39:14. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Blue2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #27357 was submitted on Oct 29, 2019 03:44:53. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:44, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]