User talk:Bhavs Mo

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iroshan Sarathchandra (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dreamy Jazz were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iroshan Sarathchandra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Iroshan Sarathchandra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 16:42, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Blotted Ink! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 16:42, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:43, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Iroshan Sarathchandra

Draft:Iroshan Sarathchandra, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Iroshan Sarathchandra and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Iroshan Sarathchandra during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:46, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bhavs Mo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

Bhavs Mo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

This was my first article submission and contribution to Wikipedia so I seemed to have made errors. I shall review the feedback and edit the draft as instructed Blotted Ink (talk) 18:07, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

When that error was failure to understand the purpose of this website, that is a big deal, no? You will not be unblocked unless you can persuade us that you are here to improve the encyclopedia and not for marketing purposes. MER-C 12:38, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

globally renamed Blotted Ink to Bhavs Mo

globally renamed Blotted Ink to Bhavs Mo DlohCierekim 08:03, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

@Dlohcierekim: You shouldn't have renamed this active sockmaster (see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Blotted Ink/Archive) while the block is active. Renaming compromises sockpuppet investigations. I think the account should be renamed back. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

@Vanjagenije:It was a SPAMU block with no indication of being a sock block. If it's a sock block some indication in the block log or on the talk page would be useful. In just going through the unblock requests, reviewing the edits and the block log, there was no indication to not rename. There still isn't. DlohCierekim 20:47, 29 April 2019 (UTC)