User talk:Blofeld of SPECTRE/ArchiveMay2007

Image:Maltesedvdrelease.jpg

I have tagged Image:Maltesedvdrelease.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you.

(ESkog)^(Talk) 15:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You Only Live Twice

All I've done on You Only Live Twice in the past almost two weeks is move "Vehicles and gadgets" below "Plot". How does that make it considerably worse? You're overreacting. When I cut down From Russia With Love, it was by request. Not only that, the person requesting was warned about my prior work. And in the end, they liked it. So, just take a chill pill, and stop accusing people of intentionally degrading articles. ColdFusion650 12:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tibet

Hi thanks for your message. Yet again an unregistered user has vandalised the page just now, inserting "fuck a nigger". Do you think it might help to block unregsitered and new users from editing the article even if only for a short period? It is every day at the moment and it is getting way beyond a joke.♦Tangerines BFC ♦·Talk 23:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And just to add to the above, the same user will not be very happy with me now as I have just reverted a comment left on the talk page. I have tried reasoning with them, and even edited the main article following on from what they said when they weren't aiming digs at me. I know I have responded, and that this discussion should be about the content and not other users, which I have tried to do for the most part. But when no matter what you say to someone they just want to disagree and argue with you, then debate is pointless. I still believe the article should be blocked to unregistered and new users though. I don't want to leave editing the article but it is getting beyong a joke on there now.♦Tangerines BFC ♦·Talk 00:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For Your Eyes Only filiming in Cortina

Do you happen to know when they were filming For Your Eyes Only in Cortina d'Ampezzo? The reason I ask is that I am in the process of working in the bobsleigh, luge, and skeleton articles, including the tracks they race on. This includes the Cortina track which from watching bobsleigh coverage on Speed Channel from John Morgan in the United States stated that the track was shortened from its length of 2200 m set at the 1956 Winter Olympics to its current length of around 1600 m following the 1981 FIBT World Championships. Was the escape that Bond used on the Cortina track done before or after because Morgan stated the track was shortened following the 1981 event? Please advise. Chris 01:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I sent an e-mail to Morgan earlier today. Since he is the Speed Channel person on bobsleigh, Morgan might be avle to give me better insight. If he does not, then I will consider the MI6 website as suggested earlier. Chris 20:42, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- I am in the process of creating the individual championships for bobsleigh, luge, and skeleton, then I will go to the biographies on this. Mr. Morgan also informed me that the filming for the Bond scene on the track at Cortina occurred the week after the 1981 championships finished. Chris 20:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Wayne

First, happy birthday! Mine's coming up at the very end of the month, so I'm excited too. I fixed the John Wayne filmography, somebody just left off a / in the reference tag. Have a good birthday, I'm off to finally watch Spider-man 3! --Nehrams2020 00:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hindi-film-stub

I remove the fair use image from this template since it would be a big stretch to claim fair use rights when it's only being used for aesthetic value not directly related to the film it depicts. In any case, if you can find a free image to use that would be nice. gren グレン 09:24, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure what the copyright law in India was in 1931... but, since it was part of the British Empire then it could very well follow British law and not be in the public domain (unless under certain circumstances, such as non-renewal, which would be difficult to find out or prove). If you know it to be public domain, that would be good news. gren グレン 09:27, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:OttoBrandenburg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:OttoBrandenburg.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:08, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mainling County

Hey, in the article you started on Mainling County, it gives the Tibetan spelling as "(Tibetan: ཀོང་པོ་རྒྱ་མདའ་རྫོང་ Wylie kong po rgya mda' rdzong)". Where does this come from? Can you double check it? It doesn't appear to match the phonetic spelling.—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 16:23, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's the point of creating a bunch of articles about locations in Tibet if the information in them is not accurate?—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 20:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not that they cannot be expanded, it's that, in the meantime, they are doing more harm than good if they contain incorrect information.—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 20:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is harm in stubbing them if the stubs contain false information. Yes, kong po rgya mda' rdzong is an inaccurate spelling of "Mainling County", and I don't see anywhere else on Wikipedia where this spelling is used. Actually, this is not the first time I've noticed this sort of problem in an article you've started. For instance, you wrote in the article on Amdo County that it is the birthplace of the current Dalai Lama, which it certainly isn't, and you created an article on "Pyenzhangling", which appears to be a misspelling of "Pelgye Ling". What I'm saying is, please be more careful in the future.—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 21:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that should be fine, then.—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 21:56, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, Milarepa's Cave is a nice article. As for Pyenzhangling, I can't fault you too much for using Lonely Planet as a source; I can see where that might sometimes be necessary. However, it's not too surprising that occasional errors creep in, since it's not a scholarly work. Regarding Amdo, the Dalai Lama was born in Taktser, which is in the province of Amdo. What's now called Amdo County is a tiny corner of the historical province, and Taktser is a tiny corner way on the other side.—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 23:28, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vilen Kunnapu

The article Vilen Künnapu has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. J Milburn 11:51, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I am so sorry. I have restored it, after a conversation with Phaedriel. I reccomend you stick some links in there, to avoid letting something like this happen again. When I realised it was written by you, I thought I must have made a terrible mistake... Again, sorry. J Milburn 11:59, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That said, there is no need to hit me with a 'I can't stand editors like you!'- the article did not explain notablity, and was tagged by another editor as a speedy. I was just trying to do my bit to clear the huge backlogs- if an editor wants to defend 'their' article, they are welcome to use a hangon tag. If you had included some links/sources in the first place, there would never have been such a misunderstanding. J Milburn 12:03, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vulcana

Quick work; let's hope the pics withstand the Wiki copyright sniff test! Also, I'd like to see a complete shot of the La Santé par les Sports cover. It would look more encyclopedic, and a high res version of the flex would be welcome to all. -- Yamara 11:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:007HaiFat.jpg

Hello, Ernst Stavro Blofeld. An automated proccess has found and removed a fair use image used in your userspace. The image (Image:007HaiFat.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Ernst Stavro Blofeld/Sandbox. This image was removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image was replaced with Image:Example.jpg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image to replace it with. User:Gnome (Bot)-SPEAK TO ME 20:35, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aage Haugland

Do I deduce that you were thanking me for my expertise in Danish rather than questioning why the King Arthur people were putting their banner on Wagner operas? Anyway, I have no expertise whatever in Danish but it was pretty clear what most of it was saying, so I just did it, with the aid of Google, etc. I think the only important thing missing is more recordings. --GuillaumeTell 17:27, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fine. I still can't see what Haugland has to do with James Bond or Argentina! Anyway, here's a free Danish-English dictionary and there may be others. If you type boghandler into the Danish box it (rather boringly) tells you that it means bookseller. That's one of the only two Danish words that I know. The other is og. --GuillaumeTell 17:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GB film list

I have absolutely no problem with you setting up the lists however you wish. As I haven't been a part of this kind of project before I just want to make sure of what you are planning. Do you mean to make each decade its own page? I just want to be sure of how different it will look the next time I go there to edit. I am opening two windows as I work so that I can cut and paste from the film to add to the list. In doing this I also try to fix flaws or add missing materials (like IMDb links) when I am on the individual film pages. Again whatever you think is the right thing to do is fine by me. MarnetteD | Talk 21:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks great and this will save a ton of scrolling each time I go into edit! MarnetteD | Talk 21:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:AageStentoftwithDirch.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:AageStentoftwithDirch.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 22:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:CountLippe.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CountLippe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:02, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:CommanderCarter.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CommanderCarter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:CinemaofKiarostami.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CinemaofKiarostami.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:44, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:CasinoRoyaledvdcover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:CasinoRoyaledvdcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:01, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Aainaposter.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Aainaposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:04, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PrincessDiana.jpg

I have tagged Image:PrincessDiana.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. If this image is being used as a link target instead of displayed inline, please add {{not orphan}} to the image description page to prevent it being accidentally marked as orphaned again. hbdragon88 06:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fight Club image

I'm not sure if the image really adds anything to the article. If you're not aware, the standards for non-free content have been tightened, so even more so than ever, images need to be tied in to the content. I chose the image of Tyler and the narrator in the Plot section because they are the major characters of the film, and the image of Marla and the narrator to the relationship part of the Themes section. Is the image supposed to illustrate any aspect of the article in detail? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I've been dealing with the same kind of crackdown. I don't think that they're wrong, but their approach is rather brusque. I think it's hard to accept that we may not have applied fair use rationales appropriately all this time because we're accustomed to the traditional setup. This upheaval is annoyingly abrupt, you know? This is something that should have been clarified a long time ago instead of now. Anyway, I'll look through the article and see if the image can be reasonably tied to any part of it. Screenshots are supposed to be for "critical commentary". If I do remove it, I'll see about deleting it. How would one go about that, just in case? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:51, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's what's been bothering me about the crackdown. The reasonable film editors haven't been trying to exploit loopholes or push their luck with defining fair use rationale. We learn from Featured articles and seasoned editors how to discuss and select images, and all that discussion goes to waste when the images are abruptly removed. We're not trying to cheat or anything -- we just went with what seemed accepted by consensus. Anyway, I'll be busy the rest of the day, so I won't be able to work out the new image right now. I'm sure it can stick around for a bit until we can figure out a way to lock in some kind of rationale for it. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:GeorgeCukor.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GeorgeCukor.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Actor infobox

Hello again Blofeld. Long time no talk. I appreciate your adding the infoboxes to some of the Thai actors and actresses. I wanted to let you know I have a few problems with this infobox.

The placeholder image. It's annoying and ugly, and doesn't add any information. Frankly, I hate it. I hate the very idea of it. I understand the intent, but I don't believe the mainspace is the place for this type of thing.
Flags. Why? There's text that says Thailand. That's enough.
The background color. Is silver really the background color? The actor infobox is very unstable right now. The background color is among many issues that have never been resolved. I have preferred to not use the actor infobox at all until the template is stabilised. I have attempted to raise this in the past and nothing was ever resolved. The template's current discussion page has someone questioning it yet again, and no one seems to know the answer or is interested in resolving the issue.
When I do use an actor infobox, I prefer to use it on an article that is lengthy enough to accommodate the box, and has enough information to justifiably fill in the box, with things like a photo, birth date and birth place, at the bare minimum. It's simply unnecessary on stubs. Sombat Metanee is the model for Thai actor pages. It's the best I've been able to put together so far.

Again, I really really do appreciate your work and the energy you bring to Wikipedia and film articles. I enjoy our collaborations. I am asking that you simply hold off on adding any more infoboxes to stubs until the actor infobox template is stable and then add them to articles that are better developed. It's good to be back and see you're still around. Take care! — WiseKwai 18:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. Aranya Namwong's looking better. It's much neater. I'd love to get her picture sometime. She's still quite striking. On the colour, some folks have been using silver for deceased actors, and gold for living, which to me is odd. The colour ought to be a hard-wired default, and be standard for all actors, living, dead or otherwise. Right now, though, the infobox discussions are bogged down with what awards to add or delete. It's tiresome. Thanks again for your work. — WiseKwai 18:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ta fa likit is a great choice for a much-needed Thai film article. It's very notable. It should be moved it to its English name, Who Is Running? (note the question mark). It'll actually link up with at least a couple of pages under that name already. I can cast in a couple of places for a clearer image. Until then, there is a way to limit the size so the pixels aren't blown; I've used an image size field in the infobox in a couple of other articles, and will look into that fix as well, if I can't find a better image. — WiseKwai 18:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Egger

Hi again. I didn't recognize the name at first. After I read his IMDb page I went and pulled my copy of A Fistfull of Dollars off the shelf and found him in it. A shame that he passed away before he could be in more things that I could have seen. Thanks for bringing it to my attention :-) MarnetteD | Talk 01:08, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Source

For Lippo Memmi? I simply translated Italian article, no sources given there. --Attilios 10:09, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:KarenLykkehus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KarenLykkehus.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:07, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

sure

yeah i would be interested in this new project MasterEditor99 17:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two things

I would be happy to help where I can with your new project and you might want to think about keeping them as two seperate projects (or project within a project) as the spaghetti westerns do have a different feel from traditional ones (to me anyway). Be aware that I am not very computer literate, thus, I am not good at creating tables or infoboxes and, as a wikignome, I think that my strengths are fact checking and cleaning up edits previously made.
Would you please take a look at this page Thérèse Raquin (1928 film) as I am not sure what to do with it in regards to our List of British films pages. The film itself is German and I don't think that it should be on our list. The article does mention some other productions of the novel. I think that they should either be moved to the page for the novel or split into a disambig page, both of which are suggested by others. It might be left on the category page (though even that is debatable) but, as stated above, I would lean to saying that it should not be on the 1928 section of our list. Let me know what you think because I am flexible to handle this however you think best. Thanks for the help and the note and I think that Enzo's acting opposite Eli Wallach's in that scene in GBU is a treat. MarnetteD | Talk 19:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Czechoslovakian aircraft

Thanks for your suggestion. The current footer is the one that appears on all aircraft articles. I'm currently at least stubbifying Avia aircraft appearing on the list of missing aircraft. When I'm done in a few days, I will indeed be implementing extra navigation between these types. In the meantime, you can access similar types through the Category system. Cheers --Rlandmann 21:18, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the idea. Like I said, I'll be implementing navigation after I'm through with this batch of Avia-built aircraft (via the standard "Related content" section used by WikiProject: Aircraft) --Rlandmann 21:25, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:RedRiverValley'99.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:RedRiverValley'99.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aircraft categories

why all sorts of coplex categories are being created - ask people, who invented it (or ask User:Rlandmann - he seems to be closer to Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft). Or just search in WikiProject page. Personally, I like it (maybe there are only 2 or 3 categories, that I'd delete). If we describe all aircraft of the world, there will be more in most categories. Pibwl ←« 14:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Ghoul.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ghoul.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Spaghetti Westerns or WikiProject Westerns

Hey. I think these sound good and both projects should definitely exist at some point, but I'm unsure if there are enough interested editors at this time. Maybe this should be proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals? Prolog 18:33, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, unfortunately. It's good to know that there are interested editors, but since this would be a descendant of WP:FILMS, you might want to notify people at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films before starting up the project. Prolog 20:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Film biography project

Ernst, what is the status of WikiProject Film biography? Is it a go yet? —Viriditas | Talk 23:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool! I'm always the last to know... —Viriditas | Talk 23:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

You have copied material from here (or a similar site) and inserted it into the article on Nyingchi.[1] That's not good. Please have a look at the Wikipedia rules on Copyrights. —Babelfisch 06:21, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dharkay Restaurant

Well, welcome anyway! Sorry - I was dealing with a string of Justin Loves Tiffani, chinese import-export company officers and Fred's Drywall pages, and the template usually is right for that sort of thing. But it did look like an ad, albeit much better-formatted than usual. Certainly if it's THE place to go in Lhasa, by all means, it stays. Wombatcat 19:07, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nice for an afternoon's (?) work. I find that it takes forever to write a few paragraphs on something that I have all the sources for. But then I'm about 34,000 edits behind you. By any chance, was Tanny the dog a Tibetan Terrier? Wombatcat 20:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, a fox terrier's in character for somebody named St. G Littledale. Too bad it wasn't a TT; they're authentically Tibetan, unlike a few other locally-named breeds. Wombatcat 21:01, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I free-associated a name that was less real-life than the name I usually contribute under, so the 14-year-old sociopaths that hate it when I revert their stuff don't go after my contributions. And if people want to think I'm in Australia, that's OK too. I'm probably best-informed about North American birds, but that's being covered pretty well. My contributions have generally been limited to local geography and history around Maryland, or fact-checking and spelling-Nazi behavio(u)r. Wombatcat 21:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:KaiNormannAndersen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KaiNormannAndersen.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:USSPrevail(AM-107) .gif

Thanks for uploading Image:USSPrevail(AM-107) .gif. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DalaiLama-13 lg.jpg

Hello, Ernst Stavro Blofeld. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:DalaiLama-13 lg.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Ernst Stavro Blofeld. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 23:33, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

South Tibet

I think it's wonderful that you plan to copyedit and improve the article on South Tibet. Please have a look at the discussion page before you edit the article, there's quite a bit of material that I've removed because it wasn't properly sourced, but it could still be useful. —Babelfisch 01:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zentil Property Management Inc.

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Zentil Property Management Inc., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Robocoder (t|c) 03:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chasing The Dragon

Hi Ernst, I came across Chasing The Dragon and thought about prodding it, but thought I should ask you first. I simply cannot find any information about it online...does it even exist? It certainly isn't on IMDB. Thanks, Iamunknown 04:04, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:IngerStevens.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IngerStevens.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:07, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:LaKermesseHéroique.jpg

Hello, Ernst Stavro Blofeld. An automated process has found and will an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that is in your userspace. The image (Image:LaKermesseHéroique.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Ernst Stavro Blofeld/French film. This image or media will be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. This does not necessarily mean that the image is being deleted, or that the image is being removed from other pages. It is only being removed from the page mentioned above. All mainspace instances of this image will not be affected Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 17:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Congratulations, Ernst, for all the good work you have been doing upgrading articles related to Tibet. Thanks! I especially like the beautiful photo of the Songtsän Gampo and his wives - it is a real treat! My time is, at the moment, almost totally consumed in editing and formatting my annotated translation of the 'Chapter on the Western Regions' from the Hou Hanshu and fighting off racial supremacists on the Jat people and related pages. I am hoping to be able to send my book off to the publishers soon. When that is done I will, hopefully, have more ime to spend on articles related to Tibet. I do have some new ideas and new books to draw from. More later. Best wishes, John Hill 02:53, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:PardesiBabu.jpg

Hello Ernst Stavro Blofeld, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:PardesiBabu.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Ernst Stavro Blofeld/Indian film. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Bulgarian films

I'll take on the 1960-2007 films as soon as I'm finished with the 50s one. The 1919-1949 needs to be rewritten though, cause the actual list is quite different. But it'll do for now - I really want to finish with the newer films and then come back to the first.

As for the Romanian films, unfortunately I doubt you can get any help ftom me. I don't have any sources for them and even if I had I don't speak even a word of Romanian. Cheers --Laveol 18:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but at the moment I'm stuck with a lot of work and study :( I,m afraid to start it cause I know I'll get too much involved with it and my studies will definetly suffer. That's why I've moved the article to User:Laveol so that it doesn't stay there being under construction and all. As soon as I'm sure I'll have enough time I'll finish it. It's really a lot of work - I'm doing only minor edits in Wikipedia, till I prepare for my exams (or eventually get tired of studying) --Laveol 21:12, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:ManuelGuimarães.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ManuelGuimarães.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:NgawangJigmelife.jpg

I am afraid I have nominated this file for deletion; it seems to fail our fair use criteria, since it could be replaced with a free photo of the individual. If you believe this is not the case, please comment at Images for deletion; in that case, a fair use rationale should be written. Alternately, you may contact the image's copyright holder and ask it to be released under a free license, such as GFDL or Creative Commons attribution or attribution-sharealike (see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for more details). Regards, Mike Rosoft 12:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; the image description page should also identify the image's source and copyright holder, if known. - Mike Rosoft 12:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The fair use rationale is good enough, in my opinion. - Mike Rosoft 12:27, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I have withdrawn the deletion request and posted a notice to that effect in the deletion listing. Sorry to bother you. - Mike Rosoft 12:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tibetan festivals

Hi! Thanks for all your good work and drawing my attention to the festivals. I have added some text into the article on the Sho Dun Festival and on the festival page itself. It's great to see my photos being featured - thanks! Cheers, John Hill 23:37, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:HerttaKuusinen.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HerttaKuusinen.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 18:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:JigmeDorjiWangchuck.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:JigmeDorjiWangchuck.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Krzysztof Krauze

...was not chosen for WP:DYK because of no references. Please list your articles on Portal:Poland/New_article_announcements so we can work on such issues quickly. It's a shame such large article was not complete enough for main page.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 18:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Book is fine. Inline references are very helpful; mind also DYK deadline is one week stretched, five days usually. Feel free to nom your articles at WP:DYK (template talk page), after a few you will get a hang. Articles get spotlight and attention from other editors and you get recognition for your work :) A nice system. I plow through PP naa for articles to nominate, but I do it once a week, so articles from early part of it are often to late for DYKs (could use a helper there :).--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 18:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, good editors deserve a little bit of recognition I feel :) And as DYK helps articles too, it's a win-win situation :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk} 19:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About American films of 1939

I personally think it's unnecessary, we have categories for that. --Whs tc hy 20:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have a point there, I was considering an AfD, but your point is valid. --Whs tc hy 20:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

looks better, sadly, I know nothing about films back then. --Whs tc hy 20:34, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of British Films 1940's

It looks good to me. I had been thinking about asking about the length that some of the pages might reach. The 1960's on might bear watching as they are getting somewhat long and we aren't even one third (I'm guessing) of the way through yet.

I am also wondering how we are going to add new films to the pages once we are finished. I added the category page to my watchlist but it doesn't show up after changes are made. I am guessing this is because no actual edits are made on this page since items only show up here based on category edits on the pages for the films themselves. I also guess this is my computer illiteracy showing through. Keep up the good work and we will chat with you later. MarnetteD | Talk 23:16, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Blofeld ?

So when did the queen decide to knight the SMERSH guy ? jokes apart, I am trying to create as many stubs as possible first, as there is a huge list of Hindi film not yet on wiki, I have mainly focussed on the 1960's to 1970's, now starting to get to the 1950's. It's just that there is so much to do, I think I have made at least 300 of the 600 stubs in the hindi movie stub section, if I got into making them articles it would be a long time. Hopefully there would be some guys starting to polish them and when I run out of stubs to make I would work on many myselves.

Some users like User:Shakirfan are adding to the stubs (not always the way I would want it but....). On the talk page template, there is this user User:SkierRMH who seems to be tracking the stubs and putting on the template you are asking for and there is this SatyrBot too. I just figured that it gets done anyway but no one creates new stubs, so I focus on creating and linking new stubs (the linking takes a lot of time at times as any Hindi word of a films title could be typed as a variation so one has to go to individual actor pages and clean up the links).

How did a guy from Wales get involved in Hindi (among other) films ? And yes the list of Bollywood films new template is good and thanks for taking it on to clean it up and add to it.

Haphar 13:12, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wildlife of Laos

You've created that list, however I somewhat doubt those two Rafflesia species actually are found in Laos. [2] does not mention Laos for any species. Do you still know why you included them? andy 19:47, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OkTediMine.jpg

Hi Ernst Stavro Blofeld: Are you sure that {{PD-USGov}} is the right license for Image:OkTediMine.jpg? I was unable to verify it.[3] Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Terrible?

Hello Sir Blofeld. I thought the solution Farsouth came up with on the Cinema of Australia template looked pretty good. It might not be a necessary solution for all the templates, but the Australian one has enough text to balance the flag, and the flag image for Australia needs to be larger, since it is more detailed than other country flags. Just my two satang, for what it's worth. Good to see you actively editing articles on Asia. — WiseKwai 20:21, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I didn't expect a revert like that. I'd like to know what was so terrible about the change? Farsouth 03:08, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:WesleyHarris2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WesleyHarris2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bigr Tex 22:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ernest Chinnery

Great work in creating the Ernest Chinnery page. It was on my list to-do. Nomadtales 22:55, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Source of posters ?

So where do you source the posters from ? I have not done much of searching for them and am not too familiar with what sites have them available. Haphar 13:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wildlife of.....(Country) Articles

To be honest I am quite disappointed you haven't even made oan attmept to expand e.g Wildlife of Pakistan you created months ago there is a mass of info!!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 15:57, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its up and going!!!! {WildlifeofAsia}} {WildlifeofIndia}} ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 21:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for establishing and working on these series..... hopefully it will catch on soon and lots of people will create these country articles and make them more and more informative for all.

Thanks

Atulsnischal 19:22, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also just wanted to remind you and suggest that most countries have a national animal, national bird, national plant, national tree, national flower etc., it will be nice if we can accommodate these in these country-wise wildlife articles, check out National Emblem, National Animal, National Bird etc. etc.

Just an idea as kids will be swarming to read these articles soon.....

Atulsnischal 04:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:PeterTewksbury.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:PeterTewksbury.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:09, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Robert Wadlow

Source was already provided in link, no need to edit the image. Rodrigue 18:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian villages

Thank you for your message! I would like to create all the missing articles about the Hungarian places. The BAZ template what you have offered me is very good, but in my opinion it isn't practical to insert into every page. I think we should insert it into the articles about towns and cities, but not into the articles about villages. Weekshigh 22:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:JeannieHopkirk.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:JeannieHopkirk.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 07:41, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abhor

I wish. He is allegedly included in the Coptic Calendar, which might have more data, but I don't have access to that source right now, and the Coptic Encylopedia doesn't mention him or his sister, although it doesn't mention a lot of people Holweck does. Also, the entry on his sister, later in the book, doesn't help in that regard either. I'm thinking that there's a good chance a lot of these mini-bios I'm making out of the Holweck book will, if no further info can be found, eventually merged into some other pages, maybe by feast day or something similar. But right now, having even searched the English language net, I can't find anything else which seems to reference him. As soon as I'm done with the "A"'s, and there are a lot of them out of the Holweck book, I'm going to try to find other sources which will have information on the stub articles starting with A. John Carter 16:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: unsigned band

I understand this, and have pondered about making the articles long and hard and thought it was about time we deserve one. We have played countless gigs since we were formed (almost a year ago) and although we are not signed; we have been approached by several independant companies around the Brighton area. We made 100 sample CDs with 5 tracks on which we sold at 3 gigs around our area... all of which were sold out by the third one... I understand you're concern and have decided to delete The individual member articles; but the main article shall stay. If it is deleted by admins then so be it.

Hello

Hi, Ernst. I'm not sure what's going on. You left a message on my talk page and then deleted it along with my response. Probably just a mistake, huh? Anyway, here's something wierd: Your image of Split Point Lighthouse, Aireys Inlet, Victoria, Australia has been my wallpaper for months. I'm not sure where I got it, but it could have been on Wikipedia. Did you really take it? I thought it was a strange coincident. Cool. Peace. --Evb-wiki 16:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Daniel Kelly (bassist)

I just reverted your removal of all content. I have the impression we just add the db-tag on the top, we don't normally blank the page while doing so. (would perhaps been an idea on an attck-page, but this was not.) Just correct me back if I am wrong. Greswik 16:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

I'm placing List of cinemas on RfD, since it seems like a rather confusing redirect. Nyttend 16:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NHS

Thanks for the advice. I've changed them now. Samantha of Cardyke 17:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Gösta Cederlund

Hi. Thanks for that. I'm mainly focusing on the films of Ingmar Bergman at the moment (I've added about 8 or 9 new articles recently for him), so no doubt there will be some new Swedish stubs cropping up soon! Lugnuts 17:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

economy of Tibet

Hi, there. What's up with the economy of Tibet article. It looks like a copyvio from [4].—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 19:52, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I'm following you. If it is a copyvio, it needs more than just copyediting. It also has major POV issues, which makes sense considering the source.—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 20:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's just plain not acceptable for you to take a copyrighted article (which also happens to be Chinese governmetn propaganda, to boot) and illegally place it on Wikipedia, leaving it to sit there for months. You have a lot of nerve to complain about me "grilling" you after pulling something like that.—Nat Krause^{(Talk!·What have I done?)} 20:48, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible adminship

I noticed on your user page that you have already been asked to consider becoming an admin. I checked the records, and couldn't find any evidence of your every having run for it, so I assume you declined? I do think that you would make a good candidate for such a position, and would like you to reconsider it. If you were to so request, I think you would have no shortage of potential sponsors. Anyway, just an idea. John Carter 21:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tibet article

Dear Ernst: You are doing a fabulous job on the Tibetan articles - for which I really thank you. The general article on Tibet is looking much better. I wish I had more time to make additions and do some editing. Perhaps when I finally get my book off to the publishers. Now, I know it is difficult to write fairly about the terrible destruction that has come upon Tibet since the Chinese invasion - and you will be attacked by people on both sides of this ongoing debate. One thing to keep in mind is that the Chinese do admit to a lot of damage during the "Cultural Revolution" (although they are, naturally, very touchy about all the destruction since then). Also, of course, I think it is only right to point out that probably most Chinese (at least in the early years) really believed they were doing the Tibetans a favour by "liberating" them. Rather like the situation where most Australians and Canadians thought they were "helping" their Aboriginal populations when they tried to "assimilate" them and forcibly took their kids away from their families and put them into "residential schools," and refused to allow them to speak their own languages or practice their own cultural activities.

But, at least, you should be able to detail some of what happened during the years of the "Cultural Revolution" without raising the ire of the Chinese too much. Also, I believe the government has recently admitted to "mistakes" in clear-felling the forests on the upper parts of the many very important rivers that originate in Tibet which is leading to horrific ecological disasters downstream (and I read somewhere that they are beginning to try to repair some of the damage - replant trees, etc., etc.) That would be a good subject to tackle. We must keep remembering that China is, of course, by no means alone in its mistreatment of conquered peoples or the wholesale rip-off of resources causing extensive damage to the environment - so, articles should be accurate and balanced - without too much finger pointing. (Who are we in countries such as Australia, Canada, the U.S.A. and Argentina to be pointing fingers at anyone?).

Another thing that is worrying me is that, in recent photos of the gross "amusement park" and huge square built in front of the Potala, it seems the famous and elegant Lhasa Zhol rdo-rings stone pillar (erected during the reign of Trisong Detsän), has disappeared. Do you have any contacts through whom you could find out if this is true and, if so, what has happened to it? When I was there - way back in 1993 - the pillar was still standing although fences and other crude structures had been placed around it so that it couldn't be approached closely. It was carved with very interesting inscriptions of the successful Tibetan campaigns against China in the 8th century. Fortunately, the Tibetan originals of these inscriptions and English translations are given in detail (along with many other fascinating inscriptions) in: A Corpus of Early Tibetan Inscriptions by H. E. Richardson. Royal Asiatic Society. 1985. ISBN 094759300/4 .

Keep up the good work, Ernst! I hope to be of more help if and when I ever get this book of mine off to the publishers. Cheers, John Hill 23:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stamps

I reply where the discussion was started, so it is here here. Cheers ww2censor 01:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:GBUBlowbridgebattlefield.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:GBUBlowbridgebattlefield.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 07:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Goodbaduglytucorope.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Goodbaduglytucorope.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 07:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Agatha_Christie.jpg

I have tagged Image:Agatha_Christie.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Yonatan ^talk 18:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ghoul.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Ghoul.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 19:17, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Da Ali G Show episodes

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Da Ali G Show episodes, by TTN, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Da Ali G Show episodes has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Da Ali G Show episodes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Category:Da Ali G Show episodes itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Codename: Kids Next Door episodes

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Codename: Kids Next Door episodes, by TTN, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Codename: Kids Next Door episodes has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Codename: Kids Next Door episodes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Category:Codename: Kids Next Door episodes itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finland

Hey. Yeah, I think the article covers the subject pretty well. It has at least two problems, however; it's even a bit too long (114KB) and has too few references. You have done great work with those wildlife articles. I'm no expert on Wildlife of Finland, so I will likely leave this subject for other editors, unless I find some very good sources. Prolog 11:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine, thanks. The film lists look good, and I must say you have an excellent eye on spotting all kinds of missing encyclopedic topics. There was even human hunting for almost a year before you created tiger hunting. Prolog 11:27, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marius Aam

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Marius Aam, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Postcard Cathy 18:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nørrebros Theater

You recently (May 7) created a new page on the English Wikipedia by copying from the Danish Wikipedia and flagging your own article for translation. It has now been tagged for deletion. It is not Wikipedia policy to copy text from non-English Wikipedias without first translating it. Please translate the article ASAP. Cbdorsett 16:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment on my page

Ernst, the point is when you write an article, you assume everyone reading it is ignorant on the subject. It is writing 101 - you have to treat all your readers as if they are ignorant on the subject. You don't assume they know anything. And if I tagged the article, then the article really didn't do anything to enlighten me on the subject. If you feel others are less worthy than the article I tagged, you too are free to ask that they be deleted. In the meantime, improve the tagged article so it shows to everyone, and not just those in the know, why the person in question is wiki worthy. Postcard Cathy 19:52, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

mistakes on Spanish film list

the information "chisme" list on the right page is mixed with the list. I've seen 60's and 90'd but I suppose it happens in the rest. Rohmerin 17:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for Image:WalterBryanEmery.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WalterBryanEmery.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:08, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Questions arising over our British film list

Hello Ernst. A slight problem has arisen over our film list. I tried to include the animated film The Secret of NIMH as I thought that its subject matter was British. I was completely wrong in this assumption (must be the alzheimers setting in!) but the editor who took it out pointed out that the criteria on the original list page states "This is chronological list of films produced in the United Kingdom split by decade." I am thinking that this may need some rewording as a number of the films that I have entered weren't actually made in England. I know that at least one or two were made in Canada, some of the Bond films had little or no filming in the UK, Branaghs Much Ado About Nothing was filmed in Italy and Lester's Musketeer films were made in Spain. As I think about it I am not sure what might be a better wording so I thought that I would bring this to your attention before some bright spark who likes removing items goes through our list and starts deleting things that we have so painstakingly entered.

I have had one other question come to mind that is in this subject area. The Star Wars films were largely made in the UK - Should they be on our list?

Thanks ahead of time for your assistance in these matters. :) MarnetteD | Talk 20:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note and thanks for the thanks! I am in agreement with your notes about the films that we are including, but I also think that you may want to reword the sentence on List of British films page that I put in quotes in my note above since the way that it is currently worded may imply that they must be produced in the UK to be included in our list. It gives some negative nellie the option to insist that they be fully produced in the UK based on this wording. What are your thoughts on the Star Wars films - should we add them or not?MarnetteD | Talk 21:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I like what you added to the opening paragraph to help clarify the list. I don't feel that SW needs to be added but I did want to check with you. I do enjoy seeing many of my favorite Brit character actors (some of whom also had guest roles in Doctor Who over the years) acting alongside Vader and Luke when I watch the films.

Rotherin has been helping when he can but has a couple of other projects that he is also working on. I have observed that he likes working from lists other than the main one that we have been using. This includes lists compiled from various awards that are handed out. As these are usually handed out the year after the release of the film he may get the year of release wrong in a given list. I don't think that it is a big problem as the only one that I have found so far is when he entered The Railway Children in 1971 rather than 1970, but you may want to keep an eye out for future entries. One more time let me pass along my thanks for your help. MarnetteD | Talk 22:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]