User talk:Blister Buster

September 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Ellen DeGeneres, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wefk423 (talk) 11:59, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Trevor Noah. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wefk423 (talk) 12:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jimmy Fallon, you may be blocked from editing. Wefk423 (talk) 12:03, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All three warnings above refers to the mass removal of rowspans in table accross the celebrities' article. Also the unexplained content removal from Ellen's article. –Wefk423 (talk) 12:06, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rowspan

Where does it say they're not allowed ? - FlightTime (open channel) 02:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Blister Buster, you will need to provide the source or exact sentence inside WP:Accessibility that does not allow rowspans on filmography. Please reply or else you might be blocked. –Wefk423 (talk) 07:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Trevor Noah. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:55, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on James Corden. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:09, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:13, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at James Corden. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 18:28, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:49, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blister Buster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The User:FlightTime has been reverting everything I've done ever since I was reverting his edits for the rowspans. The Jimmy Kimmel and Jimmy Fallon pages I've edits were simply replacing People's Choice Awards source with the finalists nominees. He reverted them. On the James Corden page, The awards name were rowpspaned together, even though they each had an article linked to the page, they were combined together. I left an example on the bottom to show how it was. He reverted it. On Conan, he reverted it without an explanation. Then he reverted my edits on John Oliver and Seth Meyers after I wrote on the edit summary that they didn't get the final nomination on the PCA. Then minutes later, another user reverted FlightTime's edits telling him the exact same thing I said, he didn't make it to the finals. I don't know if he's out to get me for revenge but all I know is that when I revert the pages again, he's going to report me again even though I'll end up saying the exact same thing. Blister Buster (talk) 21:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Requests that only deal with the behavior of others are not considered. You were not blocked for what someone else did, but for what you did. You have edit warred on what appears to be several pages to preserve poorly sourced edits. Until you communicate the proper way to resolve an editing dispute, you can't be unblocked early. I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 23:22, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My edits (James Corden)

Year	Award	Category	Work	Result
2012	Outer Critics Circle Award	Outstanding Actor in a Play	One Man, Two Guvnors	Nominated
	Drama Desk Award	Outstanding Actor in a Play		Won
	Laurence Olivier Award	Best Actor		Nominated
	Whatsonstage.com Awards	Best Actor in a Play		Won
	Tony Award^[1]	Best Actor in a Play		Won

Current (James Corden)

Year	Award	Category	Work	Result
2012	Outer Critics Circle Award	Outstanding Actor in a Play	One Man, Two Guvnors	Nominated
	Drama Desk Award	Outstanding Actor in a Play		Won
	Laurence Olivier Award	Best Actor		Nominated
	Whatsonstage.com Awards	Best Actor in a Play		Won
	Tony Award^[2]	Best Actor in a Play		Won

And probably if you'd stopped reverting and sought consensus or dispute resolution, your opinion would have prevailed. You are not blocked for being right, but for not stopping, discussing, and seeking consensus. That I think is what we are getting at.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:13, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unblock discussion and general education

~~Please answer in your own words--~~

What is edit warring?

What does WP:BRD mean?

What are the alternatives to continue to revert when reverted?-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:04, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well dog my cats. I was gonna unblock cause I thought I'd overdone it. (Now a CU block)-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:34, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

^ Kennedy, Maev. "Tony awards: James Corden raises bar for emotional acceptance speeches". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 11 June 2012.
^ Kennedy, Maev. "Tony awards: James Corden raises bar for emotional acceptance speeches". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 11 June 2012.

[1] Kennedy, Maev. "Tony awards: James Corden raises bar for emotional acceptance speeches". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 11 June 2012.

[2] Kennedy, Maev. "Tony awards: James Corden raises bar for emotional acceptance speeches". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 11 June 2012.

[1]

[2]