User talk:Bleblemi

May 2020

Hello, I'm Killarnee. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ikare, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 23:49, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Joseywales1961. I noticed that you recently made an edit in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. With this edit [1] to Religion in Nigeria you marked the edit as Minor when in fact you added some text and a source - Please read Help:Minor edit so that you will know for the future when to mark and edit as minor. Best wishes JW 1961 Talk 21:22, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Carlos Wallace New.png

Thanks for uploading File:Carlos Wallace New.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:45, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carlos Wallace moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Carlos Wallace, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 18:38, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Bleblemi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Carlos Wallace, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 18:39, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Carlos Wallace

Hello, Bleblemi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Carlos Wallace".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:49, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, I'm Curb Safe Charmer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Startup company, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:46, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Startup company. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. bizop.org – NJD-DE (talk) 00:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Business process orientation has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. (from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14637151111122347/full/html) firefly ( t · c ) 09:19, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Bleblemi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Desmond Lim, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 01:32, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bleblemi. Please acknowledge that you are not being paid to edit the K. Shanmugam page before continuing to add content. While Wikipedia assume good faith, it also requires communication (see WP:CIR). Your edits to the page are bordering on promotional of the subject and this has to be addressed first. Best. Seloloving (talk) 14:18, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was not immediately aware that you left a message on the Talk page. Apologies! Well, I have no connection of any kind with the subject and I received no pay from anyone. My main interest is to contribute by providing information appropriate for the page and for anyone who needs such information. My contribution (Women's Rights) did not in anyway talk about or attempt to promote K. Shanmugam. This is an independent contribution. Thanks --Bleblemi (talk) 00:18, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification Bleblemi. Unfortunately, the content is still written with a promotional tone even if you did not intend it to be. Please do rewrite it to be more neutral in paragraph form (not point form), with the appropriate secondary sources. What has been implemented collectively as a ministry should not be attributed exclusively to him alone, if the sources do not highlight him but the Ministry of Law. Best. Seloloving (talk) 22:19, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]