Jump to content

User talk:Blakeblakeblake12345

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Blakeblakeblake12345, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Jewish American Heritage Month, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DA Skunk - (talk) 23:57, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Jewish American Heritage Month"

[edit]

A page you created, Jewish American Heritage Month, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it has no content, other than external links, categories, "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. DA Skunk - (talk) 23:57, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gondi dumpling

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gondi dumpling, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced. Not written in an encyclopaedic style. Unverifiable as it stands.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DanielRigal (talk) 21:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Chremzl

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Chremzl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you.    SIS  22:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Joshua Duggar

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Joshua Duggar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. 132 22:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

I am delighted to have you aboard. Please don't be put off by aggressive deletions and harsh criticism. Wikipedia can be that way, particularly until you learn some of the ropes. Stick around for a few weeks, and you will rapidly discover what articles must contain. In particular, you need to cite sources. With articles on synagogues, books can be particularly good sources. Sources do not need to be available online, books usually are not. You might want to look at Joel Zack's wonderful book, "The Historic Synagogues of Turkey" Also, please do write up the South Florida Jewish community. There are a number of notable synagogues in South Florida, and other aspects of communal life that merit articles. Do be in touch if I can help.Historicist (talk) 23:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New pages

[edit]

when you start a new page if you write :

at the top, you can work on it without having someone speedy delete it.Historicist (talk) 01:05, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Algazi Synagogue

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Algazi Synagogue, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

notability is (somewhat) claimed but there are no reliable sources to back this up.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan2 (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Iskenderun Synagogue

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Iskenderun Synagogue, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no indication of why this synagogue is notable

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan2 (talk) 00:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Volgograd Synagogue, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://web.archive.org/web/20120222071045/http://www.fjc.ru/communities/institution.asp?AID=87014, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Volgograd Synagogue saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:07, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Subsequent investigation suggests that much of the content you placed on Wikipedia was copied from other sites. Unfortunately, as noted above, this is against our policies as it is an issue under U.S. copyright law. Your contributions have been evaluated and, where copying was uncovered, the material has been rewritten or removed. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to come by my talk page. Should you return to contributing, please review Wikipedia:Copy-paste and be careful to remain within those policies. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:08, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Blakeblakeblake12345&oldid=1051914770"