User talk:Blake.Hammond

Blake.Hammond, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Blake.Hammond! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! 78.26 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Diggerland because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 09:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your email

See WP:OWN. The Diggerland article isn't yours. Huon (talk) 18:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Diggerland. –Davey2010^Talk 13:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to the Diggerland article

Hi, I noticed that you removed some images because of "copyright" in the Diggerland article. I have reverted your edit because I don't see any copyright issues with the pictures and they are properly licensed. If you feel like a mistake has been made please leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Blake.Hammond. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Diggerland, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 10:39, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Diggerland. –Davey2010^Talk 11:13, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Diggerland. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Davey2010^Talk 11:14, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Blake.Hammond reported by User:Davey2010 (Result: ). Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 11:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have full-protected the article for 24 hours. Please go to Talk:Diggerland and explain why your changes are justified. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 14:10, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd miscounted the reverts hence its protection, Anyway we're going to have to discuss these changes on the talkpage or atleast come to some sort of compromise, Just to note a big part of this project is collaboration and as such we all need to discuss things, All that aside you also need to stop editing the article as you work for Diggerland - If you post requests on the talkpage myself, Ritchie or any other editor/admin would be happy to help, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 14:26, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]